Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add techygarg/lattice --skill design-blueprintgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/techygarg/latticeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/techygarg/lattice/design-blueprint)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/techygarg/lattice/design-blueprint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/techygarg/lattice/design-blueprint/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/techygarg/lattice/design-blueprint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/techygarg/lattice/design-blueprint.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00140 | $0.02510 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00070 | $0.01255 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00502 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00251 |
Grade A, and why
design-blueprint scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 101 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Design Blueprint
Required Skills
Read and apply in order before Step 1:
framework:knowledge-priming-- Load the project knowledge base so every decision grounds in the real project. (always)framework:context-anchoring-- Create or load the feature's living context doc (Create / Load / Enrich behaviors). (always)framework:learning-harvest-- Load prior operational learnings at session start; harvest new ones at session end. (always)framework:collaborative-judgment-- Surface genuine judgment calls as structured options instead of silently assuming. (always)framework:design-first-- Owns the 5-level methodology. Its Entry Assessment, Complexity Calibration, Simplicity Check, and Level Completion Protocol govern Step 2. (Step 2)framework:architecture-- Validate components, layers, dependency direction, and boundary rules (design mode). (Levels 2-4)framework:domain-driven-design-- Model aggregates, entities, value objects, events, and contracts (design mode). (Levels 2-4)
Workflow
Step 1: Establish Context
-
Run
framework:learning-harvestLoad behavior. Focus hint: "design session — focus: design patterns, reliability, structural health". -
Set up the feature's living doc with
framework:context-anchoring:- Discover: scan
.lattice/context/for an existing anchor doc matching the feature name or frontmatter. - Found → Load behavior. Present the structured acknowledgment: feature name, status, decision count, open questions, constraints. Then run the resume check below.
- Not found → Create behavior. Confirm the feature name, summary, and requirement doc link with the user before creating. Then begin Step 2 — the Entry Assessment sets the entry level.
- Discover: scan
-
Resume check (when a doc was found) — derive the earliest incomplete step from the doc itself. STOP: Never re-walk agreed work:
status: approved→ design is finished. Say so and stop; suggest/code-forge.- No sections starting
## Design: Level→ start Step 2 at Level 1. - Some levels persisted → summarize the approved levels briefly, then resume at the first missing level at or after the recorded entry level (the
[Entry]Decisions Log entry; older docs without one → treat entry as Level 1). - Every level from entry through Level 4 persisted, but no
## Design Summary, orstatus≠approved→ go directly to Step 3.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 101 lines · 140 tokens per session scan A 8c323db6d923
design-blueprint is a skill published in the GitHub repository techygarg/lattice (186 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 140 tokens to every session and 2,510 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
repo-system-map
Analyze a software repository at the latest remote main commit and turn its implemented architecture into a citation-backed interactive isometric system map with a legend, selectable infrastructure buildings, dependency and payload flows, and plain-language learner explanations. For eligible public GitHub…
impeccable
Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states.…
sxo
Search Experience Optimization (SXO) — the bridge between SEO and UX/CRO. Audits the full journey from the SERP click to the on-page goal: SERP click-through factors (title/meta/rich results that win the click), then post-click experience signals that keep users and drive conversions — above-the-fold relevance and…
shiny-bslib-theming
Advanced theming for Shiny apps using bslib and Bootstrap 5. Use when customizing app appearance with bstheme(), Bootswatch themes, custom colors, typography, brand.yml integration, Bootstrap Sass variables, custom Sass/CSS rules, dark mode and color modes, dynamic theme switching, real-time theming, theme inspection…
presentation-design
Designs slide decks and one-pagers that carry an argument rather than decorate one — deck structure, headlines that state the takeaway, charts that make a single point, and the different rules board decks and conference talks follow. Use this to build or fix a pitch deck, board deck, or conference talk, to design a…
ux-product-auditor
Audits a website, app, onboarding flow, or design for usability, conversion, and product problems, tying every finding to a business outcome and a severity. Use this to review an interface, diagnose low conversion or activation, find where users drop off, get structured product feedback, or decide which UX fixes to…