Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/techymt/claude-code-superpowers/permission-systemnpx skills add TechyMT/claude-code-superpowers --skill permission-systemgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TechyMT/claude-code-superpowersWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/techymt/claude-code-superpowers/permission-system)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/techymt/claude-code-superpowers/permission-system"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/techymt/claude-code-superpowers/permission-system.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00085 | $0.01638 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00043 | $0.00819 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00017 | $0.00328 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00164 |
Grade D, and why
permission-system scanned grade D with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Reads agent configuration directoriesmediumAgent snooping
.claude/, .codex/, .gemini/ hold keys, settings and other credentials a mod has no legitimate need for.
4. To add auto-approve rules, write them to `~/.claude/settings.json` under `permissions.allow`. Rules use glob-like matchers: `Bash(git *)` approves all git bash commands; `FileRead(src/*)` approves file reads in src/. Recursive force deletehighDestructive command
rm -rf with a variable or a broad path is one typo away from removing the wrong tree.
The system is per-input, not per-tool. `checkPermissions` receives the full parsed input, so a bash tool can be auto-approved for `git status` (read-only) while still prompting for `rm -rf` (destructive). Rules match too How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 138 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Permission System
The pattern
Every tool call in Claude Code passes through a permission gate before execution. The gate is a checkPermissions(input, context) method defined on the tool itself. The framework calls this method before invoking call() — the tool never calls it manually. If the result has behavior: 'deny', the framework sends a tool_result with is_error: true back to the LLM and never invokes call() at all. This makes the permission boundary declarative: a tool that omits checkPermissions gets the default implementation, which returns { behavior: 'allow' } unconditionally.
Three permission modes control how the gate behaves: 'default' prompts the user for sensitive operations, 'bypass' grants everything silently, and 'auto' approves operations matching pre-approved rules.
Why this matters
Claude Code executes arbitrary shell commands, reads and writes files, and can make network requests. Running in a developer's local environment means a mistake has real consequences — files can be deleted, credentials can be exfiltrated, production systems can be modified. The permission system is a defense-in-depth layer: even if the LLM produces a malicious or incorrect tool call, the user is prompted before the side effect happens.
The system is per-input, not per-tool. checkPermissions receives the full parsed input, so a bash tool can be auto-approved for git status (read-only) while still prompting for rm -rf (destructive). Rules match tool names, command patterns, and file path globs, making the policy composable and auditable.
How to apply it
- Implement
checkPermissions(input, context)as a method on your tool definition — the framework calls it beforecall(), so no manual invocation is needed insidecall(). - Inside
checkPermissions, readcontext.getAppState().toolPermissionContextand pass it to the appropriate utility (e.g.,checkReadPermissionForTool,checkBashPermissionForTool) fromsrc/utils/permissions/. - When defining a new tool, implement
isDestructive?(input)if the tool performs irreversible mutations. This signals to the permission UI that extra confirmation is appropriate. - To add auto-approve rules, write them to
~/.claude/settings.jsonunderpermissions.allow. Rules use glob-like matchers:Bash(git *)approves all git bash commands;FileRead(src/*)approves file reads in src/. - The
toolPermissionContextin AppState carries the current rules — read it viacontext.getAppState().toolPermissionContext.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 138 lines · 85 tokens per session scan D 08efefff850f
permission-system is a skill published in the GitHub repository TechyMT/claude-code-superpowers (5 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 85 tokens to every session and 1,638 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it D with 2 findings (reads agent configuration directories, recursive force delete). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
brainstorming
You MUST use this before any creative work - creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior. Explores user intent, requirements and design before implementation.
auto-perf-optimize
Run agent-driven VS Code performance or memory investigations. Use when asked to launch Code OSS, automate a VS Code scenario, run the Chat memory smoke runner, capture renderer heap snapshots, take workflow screenshots, compare run summaries, or drive a repeatable scenario before heap-snapshot analysis.
chat-perf
Run chat perf benchmarks and memory leak checks against the local dev build or any published VS Code version. Use when investigating chat rendering regressions, validating perf-sensitive changes to chat UI, or checking for memory leaks in the chat response pipeline.
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…