Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add telagod/code-abyss --skill analyzing-changesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/telagod/code-abyssWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/telagod/code-abyss/analyzing-changes)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/telagod/code-abyss/analyzing-changes"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/telagod/code-abyss/analyzing-changes/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/telagod/code-abyss/analyzing-changes"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/telagod/code-abyss/analyzing-changes.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.00956 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00382 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00191 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00096 |
Grade A, and why
analyzing-changes scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
变更校验关卡
看清「改了什么、影响哪里、文档是否跟上」——是变更的体检，不是审查替代品。
何时使用
| 场景 | 跑 | 判据 |
|---|---|---|
| 提交前（任何代码改动） | ✅ | 默认门禁 |
| 重构完成 | ✅ | 评估辐射面 |
| 设计级改动 | ✅ | DESIGN.md 是否同步 |
| PR review | ✅ | 替代手工 diff 计数 |
| 跨模块大改 | ✅ | 看依赖图是否成环 |
| 紧急 hotfix | ⚠ | 跑，但允许文档同步延后到稳定后 |
三种模式
| 模式 | 时机 | 用途 |
|---|---|---|
working (默认) |
写代码过程中 | 自检，看「我现在的工作面有哪些待整理」 |
staged |
git add 后、commit 前 |
提交闸，看「这一 commit 的合理性」 |
committed |
commit 完成后 | review，看「上一段历史改了哪些范围」 |
警告判定
| 警告 | 触发 | 处置 |
|---|---|---|
| 代码 >50 行 而 DESIGN.md 未更新 | 设计层面变化未留痕 | 补 DESIGN.md「改了什么/为何」段 |
| 代码 >30 行 而无测试更新 | 测试覆盖滞后 | 补单测/集成测；或在 PR 注明「该路径已有 E2E 覆盖」 |
| 新增文件而 README.md 未更新 | 用户视角文档滞后 | 补模块入口说明 |
| 配置变更未记录 | 部署可能踩坑 | CHANGELOG / DESIGN 留迁移说明 |
| 删除文件 | 引用可能未清理 | 全仓 grep 文件名/导出符号 |
解读输出
工具产出三类信号：
- 文件分类 — 自动分代码/文档/测试/配置；用于判断「是否纯文档变更」
- 模块识别 — 把变更聚到模块边界；用于判断「跨模块改动」
- 影响评估 — 行数 + 文件数；用于判断「改动是否需要拆 PR」
拆 PR 的判据（基于 commit 角度）：
- 跨 ≥3 模块且无统一主题 → 拆
- 单 commit >500 行非生成代码 → 拆
- 一次同时改架构 + 实现 + 文档 → 通常合理（同主题）
与其他 skill 联动
- 设计级变更 → 触发 verifying-modules 看新模块文档完整性
- 安全相关变更 → 触发 analyzing-security
- 重构 → 触发 checking-code-quality 防退化
使用
node scripts/change_analyzer.js # working（默认）
node scripts/change_analyzer.js --mode staged # 暂存区
node scripts/change_analyzer.js --mode committed # 已提交
node scripts/change_analyzer.js -v # 详细
node scripts/change_analyzer.js --json # CI 用
人工复核
工具给信号，人下结论。先读受影响模块 README/DESIGN，确认：
- 职责边界是否仍清晰
- 设计决策是否仍成立
- 测试是否覆盖新路径
设计级改动须于 DESIGN.md 留痕：改了什么、为何改、影响何处。三段缺一不可。
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 80 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 10f250845b1a
analyzing-changes is a skill published in the GitHub repository telagod/code-abyss (243 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 956 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-review
Use when the user EXPLICITLY asks for a lightweight pass, or for feedback/audit modes. Triggers: 'quick review', 'light review', 'look over this', '--quick', 'check my work', 'self-review before PR', 'review my code', 'audit this code', 'PR comments to address', 'reviewer said', 'address feedback', 'review PR #X…
fact-checking
Use when verifying technical claims in code, docs, or comments before merge. Triggers: 'is this claim correct', 'verify this', 'fact check', 'is this accurate', 'check these assertions', 'are these comments true'. NOT for: checking if AI hallucinated references (use dehallucination).
adversarial-review
Use when dispatching a subagent to re-check work against external feedback (PR review comments, audit findings, multi-comment review cycles, 'did I really address X' verifications). Triggers: 'verify all the review comments are addressed', 'check that I really fixed all the audit findings', 'did I miss anything from…
executing-plans
Use when you have an implementation plan ready to execute. Triggers: 'run the plan', 'start building', 'execute the tasks', 'implement the steps', 'next task in the plan', 'work through the plan'. Also invoked by develop after planning phase completes. NOT for: creating plans (use writing-plans).
distilling-prs
Use when triaging, categorizing, or summarizing PR changes to decide where human attention should go. Triggers: 'summarize this PR', 'what changed in PR #X', 'triage PR', 'which files need review', 'PR overview', 'categorize changes', or pasting a PR URL. NOT for: judging code quality or producing findings on a branch…
reviewing-prs
Load before dispatching any subagent to review or triage a pull request, to pick the correct file version for the branch and worktree state. Required by: advanced-code-review (PR mode), code-review (--pr), distilling-prs (Phase 2), each of which names this skill at its dispatch point. Also use directly when: 'review…