Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tellmefrankie/news-engine --skill options-flow-analyzergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tellmefrankie/news-engineWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tellmefrankie/news-engine/options-flow-analyzer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tellmefrankie/news-engine/options-flow-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tellmefrankie/news-engine/options-flow-analyzer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tellmefrankie/news-engine/options-flow-analyzer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tellmefrankie/news-engine/options-flow-analyzer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00855 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00428 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00171 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00085 |
Grade A, and why
options-flow-analyzer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 73 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Options Flow Analyzer
Analyze options chain data with real vs lottery call separation — the key insight that prevents P/C ratio misinterpretation. Uses Polygon.io API.
What it does
Standard P/C ratio analysis is misleading. A P/C of 0.35 looks "extremely bullish" but may be 84% lottery calls ($0.01-$0.09 OTM options).
This skill separates:
- Real calls: Strike price within 5% of stock price, meaningful premium
- Lottery calls: Deep OTM, cheap premium, speculative bets
- Real puts: Actual hedging activity
- Lottery puts: Cheap downside bets
Analysis Output
For each ticker:
- Real P/C ratio (excludes lottery noise)
- Lottery percentage (what % of volume is speculation)
- Per-expiry breakdown (weekly vs monthly vs LEAPS)
- Anomaly detection: P/C shifts >0.3, Call OI surges >30%, IV spikes >20%
- Sentiment classification: Bullish/Bearish/Neutral with confidence
Example Output
Options Flow Summary — 2026-05-13
HOLDINGS:
CEG $299.69 | Raw P/C: 1.06 | Lottery: 61% | Adj P/C: 2.72 ⚠️ BEARISH (was neutral raw)
IREN $55.15 | Raw P/C: 0.83 | Lottery: 34% | Adj P/C: 0.55 ✅ BULLISH
KTOS $56.99 | Raw P/C: 0.53 | Lottery: 28% | Adj P/C: 0.38 🔥 EXTREME BULLISH
RXRX $3.26 | Raw P/C: 0.38 | Lottery: 84% | Adj P/C: 2.37 ⚠️ BEARISH (was extreme bullish raw)
TEM $48.46 | Raw P/C: 0.50 | Lottery: 41% | Adj P/C: 0.85 ➡️ NEUTRAL
SECTORS:
XLI | Raw P/C: 5.32 | Lottery: 8% | Adj P/C: 4.89 🔴 INSTITUTIONAL HEDGE
SPY | Raw P/C: 0.44 | Lottery: 12% | Adj P/C: 0.40 🔥 EXTREME BULLISH
ANOMALIES:
⚠️ XLI: P/C 5.32 vs 30-day baseline 0.87 — 4.5 std deviations above normal
⚠️ RXRX: 84% lottery calls — raw P/C signal completely inverted after filtering
Configuration
Analyze options flow for my watchlist:
Holdings: CEG, IREN, KTOS, RXRX, TEM
Sectors: SPY, QQQ, XLI, XLK
Separate real vs lottery calls (threshold: premium < $0.10, delta < 0.05).
Flag anomalies vs 30-day baseline.
Requirements
- Polygon.io API key (free tier covers basic data; paid tier for full chain)
- WebSearch for cross-verification
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 73 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A e4024c8540c0
options-flow-analyzer is a skill published in the GitHub repository tellmefrankie/news-engine (1 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 855 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
dcf-model
Build discounted cash flow valuation workbooks in Excel.
comps-analysis
Build comparable-company valuation workbooks in Excel.
excel-author
Build auditable financial workbooks headless via openpyxl.
hyperliquid
Hyperliquid market data, account history, trade review.
solana
Query Solana wallets, tokens, txs, and NFTs in USD.
stocks
Stock quotes, history, search, compare, crypto via Yahoo.