Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add testdouble/han/plugin install han-dddWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/testdouble/han/ddd-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/testdouble/han/ddd-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/testdouble/han/ddd-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/testdouble/han/ddd-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/testdouble/han/ddd-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00154 | $0.06800 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00062 | $0.02720 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00031 | $0.01360 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00680 |
Grade A, and why
ddd-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 461 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Project Context
- git installed: !
which git 2>/dev/null || echo "not installed" - CLAUDE.md: !
find . -maxdepth 1 -name "CLAUDE.md" -type f - project-discovery.md: !
find . -maxdepth 3 -name "project-discovery.md" -type f - personal config directory: !
bash "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/han-config-dir.sh" 2>/dev/null || echo "$HOME/.claude" - project .han/config.md: !
cat .han/config.md 2>/dev/null || echo ""
As your first action, use the Read tool on .han/config.md inside the personal config directory path above. A
read that returns no file is no personal configuration: continue silently. When that file or the
project .han/config.md probe supplies content, apply it per
config-rule.md, which governs precedence between the two files, relative-path
resolution, and what to do with a file that reads but cannot be used.
Operating Principles
Read these before dispatching anything. They constrain every step below.
- The entire repository is a valid scope. No focus area is required. If the user names a module or directory, restrict the analysis to it; otherwise, scope is the full repository. Do not ask for a focus area when none was given.
- Discovery and context model only. No migration plans. This skill characterizes what the domain structure is.
It does not produce recommendations for service splits, migration steps, or refactoring work. When the context
model surfaces a decision the team wants to act on, the right next step is
han-planning:plan-a-feature(to specify a change) orhan-coding:architectural-analysis(for a code-level view of a specific module). The context model informs those steps; it does not replace them. - Analysis surface partitions organize agent work, not context proposals. The inventory step identifies tractable areas for structural and behavioral analysis. These partitions are analytical conveniences — they must never be mentioned in any agent brief as context candidates or suggested boundaries.
- The agents own the judgment; the skill orchestrates. The skill resolves scope, surveys the surface, classifies depth, briefs the agents, collects their output, and renders the report. It does not produce DL#, CAP#, OWN#, S#, B#, or BCM# findings itself.
- Negative results are valuable. A module with no domain events and only CRUD operations is evidence, not a gap. Agents must not fabricate findings to fill sections.
- Exactly one revision loop. The skill dispatches bounded-context-modeler, then bounded-context-critic, then bounded-context-modeler once more with the critique. The loop is closed after the revision pass. The skill does not self-escalate or repeat this cycle.
- The report template lives at references/ddd-analysis-report-template.md. The skill renders that template by synthesizing agent output into each section following the template's placeholder instructions. It does not invent a structure inline.
- The synthesized prose is written for a named reader. As the skill writes each section, it invokes
han-communication:readability-guidanceand applies the shared standard, holding one audience above the writing: the engineer or product manager reading the context model and deciding what to do next.
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 461 lines · 154 tokens per session scan A 009400943c2c
ddd-analysis is a skill published in the GitHub repository testdouble/han (304 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 154 tokens to every session and 6,800 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-16.
Other skills, from other repositories
gemini
Cross-model second opinion from Google Gemini — a different AI reviewing the same changes, with deep Google ecosystem knowledge. Three modes: review (pass/fail gate for Google Ads campaigns, SEO metadata, or code), challenge (adversarial stress-test that tries to break your changes), and consult (open Q&A with Gemini…
audit
Project health audit and health check — architecture, performance, tests, dependencies, code quality. Use when assessing overall project health, before releases, or after refactors.
boundaries
Analyze Phoenix context boundaries and module coupling via mix xref. Use when checking cross-context calls, validating dependencies, before splitting modules, or reviewing architecture.
triage
Triage review findings interactively — approve, skip, or prioritize each issue. Use after /phx:review to filter findings before fixing.
pr-threads-address
Address PR review feedback by systematically working through every unresolved PR review thread on the current branch's PR - analyze each comment, make the requested code changes (with tests where useful), commit, and optionally reply and resolve.
security-architecture-review
Reviews a design or change for security before it ships — authentication and authorization, data handling, secrets, dependencies, and the secure-development practices around it. Use this to review an architecture or pull request for security, set secure coding standards, choose or tune SAST and DAST tooling, assess a…