Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/testdouble/han/edit-for-readabilitynpx skills add testdouble/han --skill edit-for-readabilitygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/testdouble/hanWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/testdouble/han/edit-for-readability)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/testdouble/han/edit-for-readability"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/testdouble/han/edit-for-readability.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00186 | $0.02255 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00093 | $0.01128 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00037 | $0.00451 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00226 |
Grade A, and why
edit-for-readability scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 137 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Project Context
- personal config directory: !
bash "${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/scripts/han-config-dir.sh" 2>/dev/null || echo "$HOME/.claude" - project .han/config.md: !
cat .han/config.md 2>/dev/null || echo ""
As your first action, use the Read tool on .han/config.md inside the personal config directory path above. A read
that returns no file is no personal configuration: continue silently. When that file or the project .han/config.md
probe supplies content, apply it per config-rule.md, which governs precedence
between the two files, relative-path resolution, and what to do with a file that reads but cannot be used.
Edit for Readability
Take a target the user already has and rewrite its prose against the shared readability standard, preserving every fact.
The judgment-heavy rewrite belongs to the han-communication:readability-editor agent; this skill's job is to resolve
what the target is, dispatch the editor over it, and deliver the result.
Operating principles
- This is the standalone readability pass. The readability standard applies at generation time, so synthesis skills (research, project-documentation, investigate, code-review, and the rest) already bake it into their own output. This skill exists for the gap the standard names explicitly: a file or draft that was written or hand-edited outside one of those skills, and so was never checked against the standard. Reach for it on an existing target, not as a step inside another skill.
- Fidelity outranks readability on every conflict the user did not create. Every claim, quantity, named entity, and stated condition or qualifier in the target survives the rewrite with its precision intact. The editor enforces this and returns a fact-preservation ledger; the skill's job is to pass the whole target through and surface that ledger, never to let a fact be dropped for the sake of a smoother sentence. A shape the user asked for is the one thing that moves this, and never for a fact whose loss would change what the reader does next.
- Prose only. The editor rewrites prose regions and leaves code fences, diagram bodies, rendered markup, and
citation identifiers (
A1,[F5], and the like) byte-for-byte unchanged. Do not ask it to touch anything else. - The editor holds the standard. Do not restate the rubric criteria here or inline the rule text into the
dispatch. The editor reads its own co-located canonical rule and applies the current standard, so this skill never
drifts from
readability-rule.md.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 137 lines · 186 tokens per session scan A f6fc630134b4
edit-for-readability is a skill published in the GitHub repository testdouble/han (255 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 186 tokens to every session and 2,255 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
router
Find the right doc before reading code. Use when asked "where is X documented", "is there a spec/ADR for X", "what's the roadmap", "open bugs", "read the docs about X", or "share the docs".
init
Set up docflow in a repo with no docs yet: scaffold the docs tree, write docflow.json, add agent guidance. Use when asked to "set up docflow", "initialize docs", "scaffold docs", or "make this repo use docflow".
check
Friendly docflow readiness check: one status, one reason, and the exact next command. Use when asked if docflow is set up, ready, or "what do I do next".
repair
Safe maintenance for an existing docflow setup. Regenerates INDEX.md, installs or refreshes recognized DocFlow-managed helper scripts, runs link checks, and reports placeholder/validation issues. Use when docflow exists, after adding or renaming docs, or when doctor recommends repair.
review
Reviews code changes for concrete bugs with P0-P2 prioritized findings. Uses parallel architectural and implementation reviewers, then validates findings to remove false positives. Use when reviewing a caller-supplied diff, branch, staged changes, file set, or pull request, and use fix mode with caller-supplied…
spec
Writes high-quality product specifications through codebase research, web research, a collaborative requirements interview, and independent review, then gives the user a link to the written spec. Use when planning a feature, defining requirements, revising an existing draft, or creating a spec/PRD. Accepts…