Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add tetherto/wdk-agent-skills --skill wdk-review-jsdocsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/tetherto/wdk-agent-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/tetherto/wdk-agent-skills/wdk-review-jsdocs)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tetherto/wdk-agent-skills/wdk-review-jsdocs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tetherto/wdk-agent-skills/wdk-review-jsdocs/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/tetherto/wdk-agent-skills/wdk-review-jsdocs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/tetherto/wdk-agent-skills/wdk-review-jsdocs.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.06392 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.03196 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.01278 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00639 |
Grade A, and why
wdk-review-jsdocs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 683 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
WDK JSDoc & Type Annotation Review
Review the source files at the provided path (or the current project's src/ directory if none given). Apply all rules below.
For each violation found, report:
- Rule violated (e.g., R1, R2, TD1, etc.)
- File and line
- The offending code
- Suggested fix with corrected code
Group findings by file. After all files are reviewed, provide a summary with total violation counts per rule.
WDK Types & JSDoc Standards
You are reviewing source files for a WDK (Wallet Development Kit) module. Apply the rules below to identify JSDoc and type-annotation violations and suggest fixes.
The rules are repository-agnostic. No WDK module is a "golden reference" — apply every rule to every module equally. If existing code conflicts with a rule, the code is the candidate for change, not the rule.
JSDoc Format Rules
R1. Every JSDoc block must start with a plain-text description before any tags
Tags like @param, @returns, @type must not appear before the description.
Violation:
/**
* @param {Provider} provider - An ethers provider.
* @returns {Promise<string>} The address.
*/
Correct:
/**
* Returns the wallet address from the given provider.
*
* @param {Provider} provider - An ethers provider.
* @returns {Promise<string>} The address.
*/
R2. Use {Object} (capitalized) in @typedef kind-markers and @template constraints, not {object}
/** @typedef {object} GetBalanceResult */ // wrong — use Object as the kind-marker
/** @typedef {Object} GetBalanceResult */ // correct
/** @template {object} TSchema */ // wrong
/** @template {Object} TSchema */ // correct — consistent with all other WDK modules
This applies only to @typedef kind-markers and @template constraints. Using {Object} as a value type in @param, @property, @returns, or @type is forbidden — see R13 (the single-use options-bag pattern in R25 is the one exception).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 683 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A b58a5c4fed5e
wdk-review-jsdocs is a skill published in the GitHub repository tetherto/wdk-agent-skills (3 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 6,392 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-04.
Other skills, from other repositories
autoreview
Pre-commit/ship code review: Codex default; optional Claude or Pi.
omh-code-review
This is a Hermes-native code-review workflow skill.
revdiff-plan
Review the last Codex assistant message (plan, analysis, or proposal) with inline annotations in a TUI overlay. Extracts the most recent response from Codex rollout files and opens it in revdiff for review and annotation. Activates on "revdiff-plan", "review plan with revdiff", "annotate plan", "review last response"…
code-reviewer
Code review specialist focused on patterns, bugs, security, and performance.
full-repo-review
Comprehensive four-wave review of all repo source files, producing a prioritized issue backlog.
agent-teams-simplify-and-harden
Implementation + audit loop using parallel agent teams with structured simplify, harden, and document passes. Spawns implementation agents to do the work, then audit agents to find complexity, security gaps, and spec deviations, then loops until code compiles cleanly, all tests pass, and auditors find zero issues or…