Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add text2future/flowix --skill ux-improvementgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/text2future/flowixWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/text2future/flowix/ux-improvement)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/text2future/flowix/ux-improvement"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/text2future/flowix/ux-improvement/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/text2future/flowix/ux-improvement"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/text2future/flowix/ux-improvement.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00028 | $0.00696 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00278 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00139 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00070 |
Grade A, and why
ux-improvement scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
84% identical to ai-assistant — 30 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
先读主题根目录 AGENTS.md、公共/项目启动书.md 和 公共/体验问题与改版方案.md。所有路径相对主题根目录。
推进本主题
本主题流程：问题收集 → 优先级判断 → 方案设计 → 可用性验证 → 上线观察。
- 问题收集：收集具体失败任务与用户证据，区分问题和改进建议。
- 优先级判断：比较影响范围、严重程度与修改成本，选择先验证的问题。
- 方案设计：给出可比较的方案，保留原流程和设计取舍。
- 可用性验证：安排同一任务的走查，记录每位参与者的表现与失败原因。
- 上线观察：上线后看同口径指标与异常，必要时回退并重新验证。
- 任务入口：
进度视图.csv。按事项ID查找记录，展示给用户时使用任务名称。 - 决策与依据：
问题证据/计划表.csv、问题证据/资料/资料清单.csv。 - 新任务：复制
公共/问题改进单.md，在改进/下用可读的任务名称建目录；场次、批次等重复任务加日期。 - 填写案例与真实任务时沿用空白模板的标题和字段，不另造一套简化结构。字段不适用写明原因；资料缺失时说明缺口及影响。过程写已发生的动作，产物保存到任务目录并登记实际路径。
- 结果写入
数据/体验验证.csv，沿用同一事项ID。检查字段单位、时间范围和对象粒度；单次任务不填项目累计数。缺失值不得用0代替。 - 本主题完成条件：改版前后同口径验证且保留回退方案。先逐项核对模板中的审核字段，再更新状态；缺少影响验收的证据时保持待确认。
本库中的教学记录
改进/验证码输入步骤/任务记录.md 与 改进/验证码输入步骤/验证码走查结果.md 展示一次任务的记录及产物。其中人物和数据为模拟；未经用户要求，不把模拟数据当作真实事实或继续虚构实际结果。外部发布、支付和联系按用户授权执行。
数据记录先确认一行代表什么对象、哪段时间与什么单位。原始记录、分类合计和项目汇总分别维护；验收表的期望结果必须与实际结果逐项对应，不能只填写“通过”。
接续任务
第二项教学任务为 改进/验证码延迟原因走查/任务记录.md。从前序反馈提取下一步，先建立新ID与计划行，再填写同一公共模板；复用数据不重复登记。更新视图前核对产物存在、审核结论与状态一致。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 34 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A 49a40b3fb1d4
ux-improvement is a skill published in the GitHub repository text2future/flowix (469 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 28 tokens to every session and 696 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 84% identical to ai-assistant, differing in 30 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
mock
Build a throwaway interactive prototype to validate one unresolved interaction or behavior before writing production code. Use when the user explicitly asks to "mock it up first" or "prototype this", or when competing UI behaviors need a disposable hands-on comparison.
build-webgl-liquid-glass
Build production-ready GPU liquid-glass surfaces with liquid-gl for React or DOM UIs. Default for refractive cards, notifications, panels, GPU bevels, and WebGL glass.
kirby-panel-and-blueprints
Designs Kirby 6 blueprints and Panel UI, including reuse/extends, programmable blueprints, value/display fields and areas. Use when changing Panel schemas or migrating legacy sections.
padding-maker
Normalize spacing and padding in Figma layouts using auto layout where appropriate.
accessibility
Audit and improve Figma designs for accessible contrast, typography, touch targets, and structure.
design-tokens
Create and maintain coherent Figma variables and design-token systems.