Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to textura-agency/ai-design-vault. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/textura-agency/ai-design-vault/main/.claude/skills/aeo-visibility/SKILL.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/textura-agency/ai-design-vaultWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/textura-agency/ai-design-vault/aeo-visibility)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/textura-agency/ai-design-vault/aeo-visibility"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/textura-agency/ai-design-vault/aeo-visibility/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/textura-agency/ai-design-vault/aeo-visibility"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/textura-agency/ai-design-vault/aeo-visibility.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00098 | $0.01120 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00039 | $0.00448 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00020 | $0.00224 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00112 |
Grade A, and why
aeo-visibility scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 23d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
86% identical to aeo-visibility — 105 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 92 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
AEO — being citable, not just rankable
Classic SEO gets you ranked. AEO gets you quoted. The mechanics differ: answer engines extract self-contained claims from crawlable text, and they weight consistency of facts about an entity across the whole web.
1. Let the crawlers in — deliberately
- Whatever produces this project's
robots.txtdecides this (a route, a static file, or a config block — resolve it fromstack.json). - Answer-engine crawlers include
GPTBot,OAI-SearchBot,ChatGPT-User,ClaudeBot,Claude-SearchBot,PerplexityBot,Google-Extended,CCBot,Bytespider. - Ask the user before changing this. "Be cited by AI" and "don't train on my
content" are different goals with different bots: training crawlers (
GPTBot,ClaudeBot,CCBot,Google-Extended) versus live search/citation crawlers (OAI-SearchBot,Claude-SearchBot,PerplexityBot). Blocking the training set while allowing the search set is a coherent position; blocking everything and expecting citations is not. - Verify server-side rendering. Answer-engine crawlers are far less reliable
at executing JavaScript than Googlebot. On a
sparender model, assume they see nothing — fix that before anything else here.
2. llms.txt
A plain-markdown map of the site at /llms.txt. Generate it from the real routes
(a server route, or a build step) rather than committing a static file that rots.
# <Site name>
> One-sentence description of what the company does and for whom.
## Core pages
- [Services](https://example.com/services): what is offered, to whom
- [About](https://example.com/about): who the company is, founded, location
## Key facts
- Founded: 2019 · HQ: Berlin · Focus: <specifics>
Keep it factual and short. It is a summary for a machine, not a marketing page.
3. Structure content so it can be extracted
- Answer first. Lead each section with the direct claim in one or two sentences, then support it. Content that builds to a conclusion gets skipped.
- One idea per heading, and phrase headings as the questions people ask.
- Self-contained sentences. "Our approach is faster" is unusable out of context; " ships marketing sites in four weeks" survives extraction.
- Concrete specifics — numbers, dates, named methods, prices where possible. Vague marketing language is unquotable.
- Comparison and definition content punches above its weight: "X vs Y", "What is X", pricing pages, and genuine FAQs.
- Mark FAQs up with
FAQPage(see theschema-markupskill). - Motion must not hide text. A heading that only exists after a scroll callback fires is invisible to an extractor. Reveals animate presence, never create it.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 23d ago First seen · 92 lines · 98 tokens per session scan A 806f9a6c2142
aeo-visibility is a skill published in the GitHub repository textura-agency/ai-design-vault (25 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Unlicense. It adds 98 tokens to every session and 1,120 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to aeo-visibility, differing in 105 lines, and is treated as a copy.
aeo-visibility compared with skills from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| aeo-visibilitytextura-agency/ai-design-vault | Skill | 25 | 2mo ago | Unlicense | A | 98 | Claude Code |
| imagegenopenai/codex | Skill | 133k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 113 | Codex |
| playwright-climicrosoft/playwright | Skill | 99k | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 19 | Claude Code |
| local-ai-agentsmicrosoft/ai-agents-for-beginners | Skill | 79k | 4d ago | MIT | A | 200 | Claude Code, Codex |
| systematic-debuggingobra/superpowers | Skill | 313k | 3d ago | MIT | A | 21 | Claude Code |
| next-cache-components-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | today | MIT | A | 95 | Claude Code |
| next-partial-prefetching-adoptionvercel/next.js | Skill | 143k | today | MIT | A | 103 | Claude Code |