Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add thangchung/agent-engineering-experiment --skill create-specificationgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/thangchung/agent-engineering-experimentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/thangchung/agent-engineering-experiment/create-specification)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thangchung/agent-engineering-experiment/create-specification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thangchung/agent-engineering-experiment/create-specification/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thangchung/agent-engineering-experiment/create-specification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thangchung/agent-engineering-experiment/create-specification.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00020 | $0.01180 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00472 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00236 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00118 |
Grade A, and why
create-specification scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to create-specification — 1 line differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 127 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Create Specification
Your goal is to create a new specification file for ${input:SpecPurpose}.
The specification file must define the requirements, constraints, and interfaces for the solution components in a manner that is clear, unambiguous, and structured for effective use by Generative AIs. Follow established documentation standards and ensure the content is machine-readable and self-contained.
Best Practices for AI-Ready Specifications
- Use precise, explicit, and unambiguous language.
- Clearly distinguish between requirements, constraints, and recommendations.
- Use structured formatting (headings, lists, tables) for easy parsing.
- Avoid idioms, metaphors, or context-dependent references.
- Define all acronyms and domain-specific terms.
- Include examples and edge cases where applicable.
- Ensure the document is self-contained and does not rely on external context.
The specification should be saved in the /spec/ directory and named according to the following convention: spec-[a-z0-9-]+.md, where the name should be descriptive of the specification's content and starting with the highlevel purpose, which is one of [schema, tool, data, infrastructure, process, architecture, or design].
The specification file must be formatted in well formed Markdown.
Specification files must follow the template below, ensuring that all sections are filled out appropriately. The front matter for the markdown should be structured correctly as per the example following:
---
title: [Concise Title Describing the Specification's Focus]
version: [Optional: e.g., 1.0, Date]
date_created: [YYYY-MM-DD]
last_updated: [Optional: YYYY-MM-DD]
owner: [Optional: Team/Individual responsible for this spec]
tags: [Optional: List of relevant tags or categories, e.g., `infrastructure`, `process`, `design`, `app` etc]
---
# Introduction
[A short concise introduction to the specification and the goal it is intended to achieve.]
## 1. Purpose & Scope
[Provide a clear, concise description of the specification's purpose and the scope of its application. State the intended audience and any assumptions.]
## 2. Definitions
[List and define all acronyms, abbreviations, and domain-specific terms used in this specification.]
## 3. Requirements, Constraints & Guidelines
[Explicitly list all requirements, constraints, rules, and guidelines. Use bullet points or tables for clarity.]
- **REQ-001**: Requirement 1
- **SEC-001**: Security Requirement 1
- **[3 LETTERS]-001**: Other Requirement 1
- **CON-001**: Constraint 1
- **GUD-001**: Guideline 1
- **PAT-001**: Pattern to follow 1
## 4. Interfaces & Data Contracts
[Describe the interfaces, APIs, data contracts, or integration points. Use tables or code blocks for schemas and examples.]
## 5. Acceptance Criteria
[Define clear, testable acceptance criteria for each requirement using Given-When-Then format where appropriate.]
- **AC-001**: Given [context], When [action], Then [expected outcome]
- **AC-002**: The system shall [specific behavior] when [condition]
- **AC-003**: [Additional acceptance criteria as needed]
## 6. Test Automation Strategy
[Define the testing approach, frameworks, and automation requirements.]
- **Test Levels**: Unit, Integration, End-to-End
- **Frameworks**: MSTest, FluentAssertions, Moq (for .NET applications)
- **Test Data Management**: [approach for test data creation and cleanup]
- **CI/CD Integration**: [automated testing in GitHub Actions pipelines]
- **Coverage Requirements**: [minimum code coverage thresholds]
- **Performance Testing**: [approach for load and performance testing]
## 7. Rationale & Context
[Explain the reasoning behind the requirements, constraints, and guidelines. Provide context for design decisions.]
## 8. Dependencies & External Integrations
[Define the external systems, services, and architectural dependencies required for this specification. Focus on **what** is needed rather than **how** it's implemented. Avoid specific package or library versions unless they represent architectural constraints.]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 127 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A 550fcf916b3f
create-specification is a skill published in the GitHub repository thangchung/agent-engineering-experiment (27 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 1,180 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to create-specification, differing in 1 line, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
phoenix-cli-development
Design and implementation guide for the Phoenix CLI (px). Covers the noun-verb command structure, dual-audience design (humans and coding agents), Commander.js patterns, configuration resolution, output formats, exit codes, and conventions for adding or modifying commands. Triggers when working on phoenix-cli commands…
playground
Author, edit, or iterate on prompts in the Phoenix prompt playground, including running experiments over a dataset. Load before any playground ui. operation call, including single-shot prompt rewrites.
phoenix-graphql
Write efficient GraphQL queries against the Phoenix API. Load this skill in two cases: (1) before composing any non-trivial GraphQL query yourself for data analysis (via the phoenix-gql bash command) — it contains schema entrypoints and patterns that eliminate the need for introspection; (2) when the user asks for…
datasets
Understand what a Phoenix dataset is and reason well about its examples, outputs, splits, and how it feeds evaluators and experiments. Load this whenever a dataset is in view or the user asks what a dataset is, how splits work, what an output "means", or how datasets relate to experiments and evals. This skill governs…
evaluators
Author or refine a Phoenix evaluator — code or LLM-as-a-judge — that scores a run's output. Trigger when the user wants to create a new evaluator, improve an existing one's logic or rubric, choose labels, or decide what to measure on a dataset or experiment. Do NOT trigger on: (1) manual prompt drafting (use…
experiments
Run, read, and compare dataset-backed experiments to find evidence that a prompt or pipeline is improving. Trigger when the user wants to iterate over a dataset with experiments, compare experiment runs, read experiment quality/latency/cost, or decide whether a change actually helped. Running a prompt over a dataset…