Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/thangchung/agent-engineering-experiment/grill-with-docsnpx skills add thangchung/agent-engineering-experiment --skill grill-with-docsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/thangchung/agent-engineering-experimentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/thangchung/agent-engineering-experiment/grill-with-docs)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thangchung/agent-engineering-experiment/grill-with-docs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thangchung/agent-engineering-experiment/grill-with-docs.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00057 | $0.00811 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00028 | $0.00405 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00162 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00081 |
Grade A, and why
grill-with-docs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
75% identical to domain-modeling — 39 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 88 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Interview me relentlessly about every aspect of this plan until we reach a shared understanding. Walk down each branch of the design tree, resolving dependencies between decisions one-by-one. For each question, provide your recommended answer.
Ask the questions one at a time, waiting for feedback on each question before continuing.
If a question can be answered by exploring the codebase, explore the codebase instead.
Domain awareness
During codebase exploration, also look for existing documentation:
File structure
Most repos have a single context:
/
├── CONTEXT.md
├── docs/
│ └── adr/
│ ├── 0001-event-sourced-orders.md
│ └── 0002-postgres-for-write-model.md
└── src/
If a CONTEXT-MAP.md exists at the root, the repo has multiple contexts. The map points to where each one lives:
/
├── CONTEXT-MAP.md
├── docs/
│ └── adr/ ← system-wide decisions
├── src/
│ ├── ordering/
│ │ ├── CONTEXT.md
│ │ └── docs/adr/ ← context-specific decisions
│ └── billing/
│ ├── CONTEXT.md
│ └── docs/adr/
Create files lazily — only when you have something to write. If no CONTEXT.md exists, create one when the first term is resolved. If no docs/adr/ exists, create it when the first ADR is needed.
During the session
Challenge against the glossary
When the user uses a term that conflicts with the existing language in CONTEXT.md, call it out immediately. "Your glossary defines 'cancellation' as X, but you seem to mean Y — which is it?"
Sharpen fuzzy language
When the user uses vague or overloaded terms, propose a precise canonical term. "You're saying 'account' — do you mean the Customer or the User? Those are different things."
Discuss concrete scenarios
When domain relationships are being discussed, stress-test them with specific scenarios. Invent scenarios that probe edge cases and force the user to be precise about the boundaries between concepts.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 88 lines · 57 tokens per session scan A 8ed158b9470f
grill-with-docs is a skill published in the GitHub repository thangchung/agent-engineering-experiment (24 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 57 tokens to every session and 811 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 75% identical to domain-modeling, differing in 39 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
phoenix-cli
Debug LLM applications using the Phoenix CLI. Fetch traces, analyze errors, structure trace review with open coding and axial coding, inspect datasets, review experiments, query annotation configs, and use the GraphQL API. Use whenever the user is analyzing traces or spans, investigating LLM/agent failures, deciding…
pxi-eval-dataset
Generate synthetic evaluation datasets for the PXI eval harness (evals/pxi/). Use whenever the user asks to create, author, draft, expand, or audit an eval dataset for a PXI tool, skill, or behavior — including phrases like "write evals for ", "test PXI behavior", "synthetic dataset for PXI", "cover this tool with…
phoenix-github
Manage GitHub issues, labels, project boards, sprint operations, and roadmap health for the Arize-ai/phoenix repository. Use when filing roadmap issues, triaging bugs, applying labels, running sprint close-out and rollover, auditing board hygiene, checking ticket-load balance across the team, keeping roadmap epics up…
phoenix-release-notes
Create Phoenix release documentation grounded in actual code changes. Use this skill whenever the user asks to write release notes, document a release, update release documentation, or mentions undocumented releases. Also trigger when the user wants to update GitHub release descriptions, add entries to the release…
phoenix-skills-audit
Audit recent changes to Phoenix's user-facing surfaces (Python clients, TypeScript clients, CLI, REST/GraphQL APIs) and patch the three external-facing agent skills — phoenix-tracing, phoenix-cli, and phoenix-evals — so they stay in sync with what actually shipped. Use this skill whenever a user asks to update those…
phoenix-docs-gap-audit
Audit documentation gaps across the Phoenix repo by analyzing recent commits to main (default: last 7 days). Use this skill whenever the user asks to find undocumented features, identify docs gaps, audit what shipped without docs, check which recent changes need documentation, review stale docs against current code…