fix-regression-guard

fix-regression-guard is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from The-Artificer-of-Ciphers-LLC/skills-from-the-artificer. It costs 84 tokens per session (774 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A rule for converting monetary values between Decimal and Double when a framework requires one specific number type. Decimal is used for money calculations, while Double is used only at the framework boundary when necessary.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it when charts, framework parameters, or other Double-only APIs need to receive or return monetary values.
Why use it?
Using Double for money can introduce binary rounding errors, and doing calculations after conversion can make totals inaccurate. The rule keeps monetary arithmetic in Decimal.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it when charts, framework parameters, or other Double-only APIs need to receive or return monetary values.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/the-artificer-of-ciphers-llc/skills-from-the-artificer/fix-regression-guard
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add The-Artificer-of-Ciphers-LLC/skills-from-the-artificer --skill fix-regression-guard
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/The-Artificer-of-Ciphers-LLC/skills-from-the-artificer

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for fix-regression-guard

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/the-artificer-of-ciphers-llc/skills-from-the-artificer/fix-regression-guard/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/the-artificer-of-ciphers-llc/skills-from-the-artificer/fix-regression-guard)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/the-artificer-of-ciphers-llc/skills-from-the-artificer/fix-regression-guard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/the-artificer-of-ciphers-llc/skills-from-the-artificer/fix-regression-guard/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for fix-regression-guard

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/the-artificer-of-ciphers-llc/skills-from-the-artificer/fix-regression-guard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/the-artificer-of-ciphers-llc/skills-from-the-artificer/fix-regression-guard.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 84 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 774 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00084 $0.00774
Opus 5.5 $0.00034 $0.00310
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00017 $0.00155
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00077

Measured 12d ago against content hash 15a11e30a4a6, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

fix-regression-guard scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

fix-regression-guard/SKILL.md · 67 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 67 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Fix Regression Guard

Before committing ANY fix, complete this analysis. A common source of new bugs in any codebase is a fix that changes a condition or guard without tracing all code paths that depend on it.

When to trigger

  • Every fix: commit
  • Every change to a guard, condition, or ownership/permission check
  • Every change to flow control (retry triggers, scheduling, reconcile or refresh paths)
  • After any agent proposes a fix

The Analysis

Step 1: List every condition you changed

For each changed if, guard, where, or boolean check, write (illustrative example from an order service):

  • Before: if order.ownerID == DEFAULT_OWNER
  • After: if order.ownerID == resolvedOwnerID
  • Intent: Only match the actual owner, not the symbolic default

Step 2: Find ALL callsites of the changed condition

# For each changed variable/function, find every reference (names are illustrative)
grep -rn "ownerID\|refreshOrders\|reconcileItems" src/ | grep -v "test"

For EACH callsite:

  • Does it still work for the positive case (condition is true)?
  • Does it still work for the negative case (condition is false)?
  • Is there a code path that previously worked but now falls through?

Step 3: Enumerate every actor that runs the changed code

List every actor, role, or client that executes the changed code (user roles, service instances, client platforms, background jobs, other tenants). For each one, does the condition still evaluate correctly?

Step 4: Check for orphaned follow-up actions

If you changed a guard that previously allowed code to run:

  • What code ran AFTER the guard in the old version?
  • Does that code still run in the new version?
  • If not, is there an alternative path?

Example: if registerWorker() previously triggered a polling cycle, and your fix changes that method, verify the polling cycle still happens.

Step 5: Write a regression test for the OPPOSITE case

If the bug was seen by one actor, write a test for the other. If the bug was on the producer side, write a test for the consumer, and vice versa. If the bug was single-actor, write a test for the multi-actor interaction.

Read the full file on GitHub · 67 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 12d ago First seen · 67 lines · 84 tokens per session scan A 15a11e30a4a6

Subscribe to this mod's changes

fix-regression-guard is a skill published in the GitHub repository The-Artificer-of-Ciphers-LLC/skills-from-the-artificer (6 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 84 tokens to every session and 774 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-15.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

agent-spending-mandate

Write a spending mandate that lets an AI agent buy things for you within strict limits: what it may buy, from whom, up to how much per purchase and in total, until when, and what needs your yes. Use when asked to let my agent make purchases, set a budget for an AI shopping agent, allow agentic checkout, limit what my…

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · 113 tokens

kyc-escalation

Write an internal KYC/AML escalation memo: a factual time-stamped trigger description, customer-profile vs activity mismatch analysis, red-flag taxonomy mapping, outstanding information, and a recommendation with rationale. Use when asked to escalate a KYC alert, document an AML concern, write up unusual-activity…

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · 93 tokens

agent-era-pricing

Redesign seat-based pricing for the agent era — when one human runs ten agents, per-seat models collapse. Use when agents are eroding seat counts, when asked to migrate to usage- or outcome-based pricing, to price an agent/API tier, or to defend revenue as customers automate their own usage. Produces a pricing…

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · 108 tokens

ai-roi-audit

Audit whether the organisation's AI spend actually paid — measured against baselines, not vendor math or vibes. Use when a CFO asks what the AI tools returned, when renewing AI contracts, when consolidating overlapping AI subscriptions, or to build the measurement plan before the next spend. Produces an ROI audit with…

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · 118 tokens

credit-memo

Write a credit memo for a lending decision: borrower story, facility structure, repayment sources, financial-ratio spread with covenant headroom, risk factors with mitigants, risk-rating rationale, and a recommendation. Use when asked to write a credit memo, credit application, credit paper, loan write-up, or prepare…

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · 83 tokens

lending-risk-brief

Write a portfolio-level lending risk brief: concentration analysis by sector, geography and single name, vintage performance, migration matrix narrative, macro-sensitivity scenarios, top watch names, and actions. Use when asked to write a portfolio risk report, credit risk committee brief, loan book review, or…

mohitagw15856/pm-claude-skills · 91 tokens