Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add The-Code-Registry/mcp-server --skill code-registrygit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/The-Code-Registry/mcp-serverWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/the-code-registry/mcp-server/code-registry)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/the-code-registry/mcp-server/code-registry"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/the-code-registry/mcp-server/code-registry/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/the-code-registry/mcp-server/code-registry"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/the-code-registry/mcp-server/code-registry.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00048 | $0.00770 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00019 | $0.00308 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00154 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00077 |
Grade A, and why
code-registry scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 77 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Code Registry Skill
Use this skill when a user asks to analyze a codebase with The Code Registry, re-run analysis, or interpret Code Registry outputs.
When to use this skill
Trigger this skill when the user wants any of the following:
- Create or access a The Code Registry account from an MCP client
- Run first-time code analysis for any purpose including due diligence, security review, or tech debt assessment
- Re-analyze an existing code vault and explain changes
- Turn code-vault results into business-facing recommendations
If the user asks for detailed polling/completion logic, read references/vault-lifecycle.md.
If the user asks for interpretation or executive framing, read references/result-interpretation.md.
Client compatibility rule (CallMcpTool wrappers)
For clients that use a generic CallMcpTool wrapper (including some Cursor builds), always pass tool inputs through an arguments object, even if the displayed wrapper schema appears to omit it.
- Use
argumentsfor every Code Registry tool call that takes inputs. - If no inputs are required, use
arguments: {}. - If tool calls fail because the client claims arguments are unsupported, retry with this explicit instruction:
Use the CallMcpTool with the arguments field to pass the required parameters.
Workflow
- Discover and validate tool availability.
- Call
tools/listwhen tool names or schemas are uncertain. - Prefer exact tool names from server docs.
- Resolve authentication path.
- If user already has an API key, use it via
X-API-Key. - If no key exists, call
create_accountfirst. - For clients that cannot set headers, pass
api_keyin tool arguments.
- Create project and code vault.
- Call
create_projectwith the targetuser_id. - Call
create-code-vaultwithsource_type: LOCAL_AGENTwhen possible. - For LOCAL_AGENT, run one command from
next_steps.commandson the machine with the target repository.
- Poll until analysis and report completion.
- Poll
get-code-vault-summary,get-code-vault-results, andget-code-vault-reports. - Use exponential backoff: 5s, 10s, 20s, 40s, max 60s.
- Treat cold starts/timeouts as retryable.
What ships with it
3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 77 lines · 48 tokens per session scan A 1a7f05977a04
code-registry is a skill published in the GitHub repository The-Code-Registry/mcp-server (1 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 48 tokens to every session and 770 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
roam
Codebase comprehension via roam-code CLI. Use when exploring codebases, planning modifications, debugging failures, assessing PR risk, or checking architecture health. Triggers on: understanding project structure, pre-change safety checks, finding symbols/files, blast radius analysis, affected tests, health scoring…
mastermind-task-planning
Choose the lightest Mastermind workflow that fits the risk, then create an evidence-grounded verified or strict task contract for delegated implementation. Direct work deliberately uses no task spec.
mastermind-task-executor
Execute an approved Mastermind task contract within Scope, prove its Acceptance Criteria, and write the canonical file-backed executor report. Use when the user hands off a .mastermind/tasks/ - /spec.md or explicitly asks to execute an approved Mastermind task.
mastermind-comment-audit
Read-only review of a non-empty comment delta. Flags narration with evidence, names what it deliberately kept, and reports removed rationale. Use when the user asks to check comments or a finished diff's pre-gate found added, modified, or deleted comments; skip automatic routing when no comment changed.
mastermind-test-audit
Read-only review of whether the tests in a finished change actually prove its behaviour — changed code no test reaches, a test exercising a different path than the one that changed, an assertion edited to match the new output, and a suite that ran nothing. Use after implementation, and whenever a change claims to be…
mastermind-critical-review
Stress-test a proposed design, task spec, implementation plan, or executor report for false assumptions, broken contracts, scope creep, missing evidence, and high-risk failure modes. Use before drafting sensitive specs, before approving a plan, or when a critic/auditor needs a compact review rubric.