Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add the-hugin/RSIm --skill strategic-compactgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/the-hugin/RSImWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/the-hugin/rsim/strategic-compact)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/the-hugin/rsim/strategic-compact"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/the-hugin/rsim/strategic-compact/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/the-hugin/rsim/strategic-compact"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/the-hugin/rsim/strategic-compact.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00039 | $0.00575 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00287 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00115 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00057 |
Grade A, and why
strategic-compact scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 65 lines · 39 tokens per session scan A 0bd06042c723
strategic-compact is a skill published in the GitHub repository the-hugin/RSIm (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 39 tokens to every session and 575 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
learn-from-fix
Capture Elixir/Ecto/LiveView lessons and Hex API rules. Use after corrections or when asked to document learning, record a lesson, prevent a fixed mistake, or remember package guidance with --library.
assigns-audit
Inspect LiveView socket assigns for memory bloat — missing temporaryassigns, unused assigns, unbounded lists needing streams, memory estimates. Use when LiveView memory grows or you need to add temporaryassigns.
recall
Recall prior work from past sessions — how a bug was fixed, what was decided, where a pattern lives. Use when asked 'have we done this before' or 'how did I fix X' in Elixir/Phoenix work. ccrider MCP when available, else git + solution docs.
compound-docs
Searchable Elixir/Phoenix/Ecto solution documentation system with YAML frontmatter. Builds institutional knowledge from solved problems. Use when consulting past solutions before investigating new issues.
context-anchoring
Manage per-feature living documents that capture decisions, constraints, and reasoning across AI sessions during active development. Scoped to feature-level work — design, implementation, bugfix, refactor — not for codebase-wide assessments or product-wide specifications (those define their own document lifecycles).…
learning-harvest
Manage the operational learnings lifecycle — load prior learnings to inform current work, harvest new patterns worth preserving, and keep the document tight over time. Provides a protocol for accumulating actionable patterns from practice that complement standards and defaults. Use when a workflow session completes…