codehub-debugging

A debugging workflow that uses OpenCodeHub, a code-search and code-relationship service, to trace bugs, errors, failed tests, and unexpected behavior.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to investigate error messages, failing assertions, intermittent server errors, callers and callees, and the ordered steps of a process.
Why use it?
It narrows the likely source of a problem before reading and changing many files. It can also check recent edits and previously recorded security findings.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/theagenticguy/opencodehub/codehub-debugging
Any agent
npx skills add theagenticguy/opencodehub --skill codehub-debugging
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/theagenticguy/opencodehub

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Per session 52 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 1,477 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 95% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00052 $0.01477
Opus 5 $0.00026 $0.00739
Sonnet 5 $0.00010 $0.00295
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00148

Measured yesterday against content hash 8aa8cf0ab0dc, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

codehub-debugging scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

95% identical to opencodehub-debugging — 10 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

plugins/opencodehub/skills/codehub-debugging/SKILL.md · 145 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 145 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Debugging with OpenCodeHub

When to Use

  • "Why is this function failing?"
  • "Trace where this error comes from."
  • "Who calls this method?"
  • "This endpoint returns 500 intermittently."
  • Investigating bugs, errors, test failures, or unexpected behaviour.

Workflow

1. mcp__codehub__detect_changes                              → Is this a recent regression?
2. mcp__codehub__query({ query: "<error or symptom>" })      → Find code related to the symptom
3. mcp__codehub__context({ name: "<suspect>" })              → Callers, callees, processes, cochanges
4. mcp__codehub__sql for a process trace                     → Ordered PROCESS_STEP chain
5. mcp__codehub__list_findings                               → SARIF findings that already flagged the area
6. Read source files only after the graph has narrowed the suspect set

If the context envelope warns the index is stale, run codehub analyze first — stale graphs point at the wrong suspect.

Checklist

- [ ] Capture the symptom (error text, stack frame, failing assertion, wrong output)
- [ ] mcp__codehub__detect_changes({ scope: "unstaged" | "staged" })
      — if non-empty, recent edits are the primary suspect
- [ ] mcp__codehub__query for the error text or related concept
- [ ] mcp__codehub__context on the suspect symbol
- [ ] Read confidenceBreakdown — if unknown > 0, an LSP contradicted a heuristic edge;
      the suspect may be a stale or dead reference
- [ ] Review cochanges (git-history signal, NOT call deps) — files historically edited
      together often point at the hidden collaborator
- [ ] Trace the execution via mcp__codehub__sql on PROCESS_STEP edges
- [ ] mcp__codehub__list_findings to see if a scanner already flagged the area
- [ ] Read source to confirm root cause

Debugging Patterns

Symptom OpenCodeHub path
Error message query for the error text → context on every throw site it returned
Wrong return value context on the function → trace outgoing CALLS for the data flow
Intermittent failure context → look for outgoing FETCHES (external I/O) + cochanges
Performance issue impact (downstream) → find symbols with many outbound CALLS (hot paths)
Recent regression detect_changes → symbols touched in the working tree or staged diff
Failing scanner gate list_findings({ severity: "error" }) → read the rule + the hit line

Read the full file on GitHub · 145 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 145 lines · 52 tokens per session scan A 8aa8cf0ab0dc

Subscribe to this mod's changes

codehub-debugging is a skill published in the GitHub repository theagenticguy/opencodehub (3 stars, last pushed 20d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 52 tokens to every session and 1,477 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to opencodehub-debugging, differing in 10 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

babysit-pr

Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…

openai/codex · 114 tokens

imagegen

Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output…

openai/codex · 113 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens

next-cache-components-optimizer

Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…

vercel/next.js · 170 tokens