Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/theagenticguy/opencodehub/opencodehub-exploringnpx skills add theagenticguy/opencodehub --skill opencodehub-exploringgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/theagenticguy/opencodehubWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00064 | $0.01306 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00653 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00261 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00131 |
Grade A, and why
opencodehub-exploring scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- codehub-exploring — 94% identical, 14 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 121 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Exploring Codebases with OpenCodeHub
When to Use
- "How does authentication work?"
- "What's the project structure?"
- "Where is the database logic?"
- "Show me the request lifecycle."
- Onboarding to a codebase you have not seen before.
Workflow
1. mcp__codehub__list_repos → Pick the repo name
2. READ codehub://repo/{name}/context → Stats + staleness envelope
3. mcp__codehub__query({query: "<concept>", repo}) → Hybrid BM25 + vector hits, grouped by process
4. mcp__codehub__context({name: "<symbol>", repo}) → 360-degree view, categorised edges, cochange side-section
5. mcp__codehub__sql for process traces → Step ordering from the relations table
6. Read source files only after the graph has pointed you at the hot spots
If the context envelope warns the index is stale, run
codehub analyzein the terminal first.
Checklist
- [ ] mcp__codehub__list_repos — confirm the repo
- [ ] READ codehub://repo/{name}/context — check freshness
- [ ] mcp__codehub__query for the concept
- [ ] Scan returned processes (execution flows) before scanning files
- [ ] mcp__codehub__context on the strongest hit
- [ ] Inspect confidenceBreakdown — prefer confirmed edges for architectural claims
- [ ] Review cochanges as a secondary signal (git history, NOT call deps)
- [ ] Follow PROCESS_STEP edges via mcp__codehub__sql to trace the flow end-to-end
- [ ] Read source files for implementation detail only
Tools
mcp__codehub__query — hybrid BM25 + vector search, grouped by process
mcp__codehub__query({ query: "payment processing", repo: "my-app", limit: 20 })
→ results: ranked symbols with file path, kind, score
→ processes: execution flows that contain the top hits (populated when PROCESS_STEP edges exist)
→ next_steps: pointer to the next tool
Use it as the first broad read after the context resource. Prefer it over Grep for concept-level questions.
mcp__codehub__context — 360-degree view of a symbol
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 121 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A e4951bd167db
opencodehub-exploring is a skill published in the GitHub repository theagenticguy/opencodehub (3 stars, last pushed 20d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 1,306 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
babysit-pr
Babysit a GitHub pull request after creation by continuously polling review comments, CI checks/workflow runs, and mergeability state until the PR is merged/closed or user help is required. Diagnose failures, retry likely flaky failures up to 3 times, auto-fix/push branch-related issues when appropriate, and keep…
imagegen
Generate or edit raster images when the task benefits from AI-created bitmap visuals such as photos, illustrations, textures, sprites, mockups, or transparent-background cutouts. Use when Codex should create a brand-new image, transform an existing image, or derive visual variants from references, and the output…
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…