Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add theam/claude-dev-kit --skill coverage-checkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/theam/claude-dev-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/theam/claude-dev-kit/coverage-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/theam/claude-dev-kit/coverage-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/theam/claude-dev-kit/coverage-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/theam/claude-dev-kit/coverage-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/theam/claude-dev-kit/coverage-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00059 | $0.01104 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00024 | $0.00442 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00221 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00110 |
Grade A, and why
coverage-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 57 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Coverage Check
Enforce the team's coverage gate: every touched file must stay ≥ 95% (line, branch, function). This skill is stack-agnostic — it runs whatever the consuming repo declares and parses whatever standard report the run produces.
1. Find the touched files
git diff --name-only against the base branch, plus staged and unstaged changes. Exclude, by convention: generated/vendored code, database migrations, and the test files themselves. Group the remaining files by the module/project they belong to so you can run the narrowest useful test set first.
2. Determine the coverage command(s)
In order of preference:
-
Declared in config — read
.claude/dev-kit.json(test.coverageCommands) and the consuming repo'sCLAUDE.md. If a command is declared, use it verbatim. -
Declared by the repo's tooling — a
test:coveragescript inpackage.json, aMakefile/Taskfiletarget, acoveragetask in the build file. -
From the stack profile — if
.claude/dev-kit.jsonhasstacks(or you detect one), readinstructions/stacks/<id>.mdfor the stack's coverage command, report path, and format, plus any prerequisite (e.g. PHP needs Xdebug/PCOV; without it, report that rather than 0%). -
Detected from the stack — infer from the project files present, e.g.:
Stack signal Typical coverage command Report produced *.csproj/*.slndotnet test --collect:"XPlat Code Coverage"Cobertura XML package.json(jest/vitest)npm test -- --coveragelcov / json-summary angular.jsonng test --watch=false --code-coveragelcov pom.xml/build.gradlemvn test/gradle test jacocoTestReportJaCoCo XML pyproject.toml/setup.pypytest --cov --cov-report=xmlcoverage.py XML go.modgo test ./... -coverprofile=cover.outGo coverprofile Cargo.tomlcargo llvm-cov --lcovlcov A monorepo may need several commands (one per language/area). Run each and merge the per-file results.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 57 lines · 59 tokens per session scan A fcc4f2708a61
coverage-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository theam/claude-dev-kit (15 stars, last pushed 20d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 59 tokens to every session and 1,104 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
run
The single lifecycle entry point — take one or more tickets and drive each through its whole lifecycle (investigate, red tests, implement, gates, review, PR, merge, archive), interleaving them. Lean by default — one worker per ticket runs red tests, implementation and the gate scripts in one worktree, then…
shipyard-verification
Requires fresh verification evidence before any claim that work is complete, fixed, or passing. Use before committing, creating PRs, or moving to the next task. Also use when a status report contains words like "should", "probably", or "seems to", or expresses satisfaction ("Great!", "Done!") before verification…
refactor
Refactor existing code by extracting helpers, splitting files, removing duplication, or untangling dependencies. Supports resumable and batch runs. Use for structural changes that preserve behavior; use zuvo:build for new features.
merger
Multi-issue integration and merge skill - handles post-QA integration of completed worktrees.
commit
A Git workflow skill that completes a TDD cycle by committing changes after required review, tests, logs, and retrospective checks pass. Git is a version-control system that records code changes and commits.
wrap-up-branch
Finish a feature branch: add missing tests, review and fix the code, align docs, then merge only after explicit confirmation.