Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add TheBeardedBearSAS/claude-craft --skill solid-principlesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TheBeardedBearSAS/claude-craftWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/solid-principles)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/solid-principles"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thebeardedbearsas/claude-craft/solid-principles.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.00171 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00086 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00034 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00017 |
Grade A, and why
solid-principles scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
SOLID Principles
This skill provides universal SOLID principles guidelines for object-oriented code quality.
See @REFERENCE.md for detailed documentation.
Quick Reference
- SRP: One reason to change per class
- OCP: Extend via interfaces, don't modify existing
- LSP: Subtypes substitutable for base types
- ISP: Small interfaces (< 5 methods)
- DIP: Depend on abstractions, not implementations
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 20 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A c10f0b2e8644
solid-principles is a skill published in the GitHub repository TheBeardedBearSAS/claude-craft (105 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 171 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
generic-fullstack-code-reviewer
Review full-stack code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, accessibility gaps, and CLAUDE.md compliance. Enforces TypeScript strict mode, input validation, GPU-accelerated animations, and design system consistency. Use when completing features, before commits, or reviewing pull requests.
generic-code-reviewer
Review code for bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance issues, accessibility gaps, and CLAUDE.md workflow compliance. Supports any tech stack - HTML/CSS/JS, React, TypeScript, Node.js, Python, NestJS, Next.js, and more. Use when completing features, before commits, or reviewing pull requests.
batch-simplify
Batch-run simplification across changed files, or across an entire repository, grouped by ecosystem and dependency order. Use when: 'batch simplify', 'simplify recent changes', 'forgot to run simplify', 'catch up on simplify', sweeping a named scope such as a branch, a whole repository, or one directory, or after a…
review
Orchestrated REVIEW phase — fan out parallel, read-only reviewers over a diff (scope-detected audit skills AND independent agent lenses), then consolidate into one severity-ranked verdict. Use for a full pre-ship review, "review/validate this PR", or "spawn agents to review". Don't use to implement fixes (use /build…
visual-review
Render a GitHub Pull Request diff as a self-contained HTML page where each changed hunk is annotated with a software-principle explanation and a suggested simplification. Use when the user wants to review a PR visually, generate an HTML/visual diff report, or see PR feedback linked to principles (e.g. an unnecessary…
code-review-architecture
Architecture-focused code review covering hexagonal boundary violations, DDD anti-patterns, CQRS misuse, and microservices coupling issues. Applied in addition to the language-specific review skill when architecture markers are detected. Invoked when reviewing hexagonal architectures, DDD patterns, or microservices…