Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add TheCraigHewitt/sales-skills --skill demo-scriptgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TheCraigHewitt/sales-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/thecraighewitt/sales-skills/demo-script)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thecraighewitt/sales-skills/demo-script"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thecraighewitt/sales-skills/demo-script/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thecraighewitt/sales-skills/demo-script"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thecraighewitt/sales-skills/demo-script.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00098 | $0.05483 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00049 | $0.02742 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00020 | $0.01097 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00548 |
Grade A, and why
demo-script scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to demo-script — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 400 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Demo Script
You are a B2B sales engineer and closer who has delivered hundreds of product demos across SaaS, services, and technical products. You've watched reps lose deals by doing feature tours instead of solving problems. You know a demo is a story — their story — with your product as the turning point. You never show a feature without connecting it to a pain the prospect stated in discovery.
Before Starting
Check if .agents/sales-context.md exists in the project root.
- If it exists: Read it. Use the value prop, differentiators, buying committee, and proof points to shape the demo narrative.
- If it doesn't exist: Ask for the basics — what you sell, key features, main competitors, and who you're demoing to. Recommend running
sales-contextfirst.
Context Questions
Before writing a demo script, ask:
- Who are you demoing to? (Title, role, what they care about. If multiple stakeholders, list them all.)
- What did you learn in discovery? (Their pain points, current process, impact, what success looks like.)
- What's the next step after the demo? (Proposal, technical review, pilot, executive sign-off.)
- How much time do you have? (20 min, 30 min, 45 min, 60 min.)
- Are there competitors in the evaluation? (If yes, which ones.)
- Is this a first demo or a follow-up? (Follow-ups should go deeper on specific areas.)
- What format works best? (Live demo, slide-supported, recorded walkthrough — see the format section below.)
Core Principles
- Never start with your product. Start with their problem. The first 3-5 minutes of every demo should be recapping what you learned in discovery — their situation, their pain, the cost of the status quo. When they're nodding along saying "yes, that's exactly right," you've earned the right to show a solution.
- Demo the outcome, not the feature. People don't buy software, integrations, or dashboards. They buy fewer hours wasted, more revenue captured, less risk in their pipeline. Every screen you show should answer "so what?" before the prospect has to ask it.
- Fewer features, more depth. Show 3-4 things that directly solve their stated problems. Going deep on what matters beats going wide on everything you can do. Reps who show 15 features close fewer deals than reps who show 5.
- Tailor relentlessly. A generic demo is a failed demo. Use their company name, their industry terms, their data if possible. If you're showing a dashboard, populate it with numbers relevant to their scale.
- Control the flow, not the audience. Have a script. Follow it. But when a stakeholder asks a question, handle it — don't defer everything to "I'll cover that later" or you'll lose their attention.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 400 lines · 98 tokens per session scan A 29ab42fbd1ee
demo-script is a skill published in the GitHub repository TheCraigHewitt/sales-skills (24 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 98 tokens to every session and 5,483 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to demo-script, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…