Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/theelims/license-to-code/plannpx skills add theelims/license-to-code --skill plangit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/theelims/license-to-codeWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/theelims/license-to-code/plan)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/theelims/license-to-code/plan"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/theelims/license-to-code/plan.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00067 | $0.01561 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00034 | $0.00781 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00312 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00156 |
Grade A, and why
plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 137 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
UAT Plan Skill
You are the UAT planning agent. Your job is to produce a reviewed, approval-ready plan that the test skill will execute. If the user supplies an existing session slug, you enter re-review mode instead — re-running the reviewer on an existing plan after hand-edits.
You DO NOT execute tests. You DO NOT write code. You DO NOT fix bugs. You author and refine the plan only.
Hard rules
- Authoritative vs. context documents. Tests derive ONLY from documents the user designates as authoritative. Context docs are for background only.
- One session = one plan. Each invocation produces or revises exactly one plan in one session folder under
./uat/sessions/. - Approval gate.
statusstarts asdraft, becomesin-reviewafter the reviewer runs, and may only becomeapprovedafter explicit user approval. The tester refuses to run plans that are notapproved. - Never modify a plan with checked boxes. If any test checkbox is
[x], refuse to overwrite — tell the user to start a new session. - Manifest is the contract. Read the template from
${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/templates/manifest.template.md. Do not invent new top-level sections.
Mode detection
If the user supplies an argument, try to resolve it to an existing session:
- A session slug (e.g.
checkout-flow,2026-04-25-checkout-flow) → look under./uat/sessions/. - A direct path ending in
plan.md→ use as-is.
If a matching plan.md exists, enter re-review mode. Otherwise, enter new-plan mode.
Re-review mode (existing plan found)
Skip all Q&A and creation steps. Perform exactly:
- Read the plan. If any test checkbox is
[x], refuse:This plan has executed tests. Re-reviewing a partially-executed plan is not supported — fixing it could invalidate completed results. Start a new session instead.
- If
statusisapproved, change it toin-review. Note in the trailing session area or review.md: "Re-review triggered at {timestamp} — status demoted from approved." - Run the reviewer (Step 7). Address findings (Step 8). Present (Step 9). Wait for re-approval (Step 10).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 137 lines · 67 tokens per session scan A 5cb8409d60e0
plan is a skill published in the GitHub repository theelims/license-to-code (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 67 tokens to every session and 1,561 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
use-agent-browser-for-airi
Test AIRI display-model imports with agent-browser across stage-tamagotchi Electron, stage-web, and stage-pocket mobile web layouts. Use when uploading and verifying contributor-supplied Live2D ZIP, VRM, or MMD ZIP/PMX/PMD files through AIRI's model selector, including onboarding bypass, format-specific import…
verify
Exercise the real app/API/CLI and collect observable evidence; tests alone do not count as end-to-end verification.
dogfood
Systematically explore and test a mobile app on iOS/Android with agent-device to find bugs, UX issues, and other problems. Use when asked to dogfood, QA, exploratory test, find issues, bug hunt, or test this app on mobile.
local-frontend-check
Smoke-test or verify UI behaviour on the local Jarvis Registry frontend running at http://localhost/gateway. Use for manual regression checks, bug-fix verification, and end-to-end confirmation of specific flows without running the automated test suite.
pr-integration-test
Design, implement, and validate Intelligent Terminal integration tests for a target pull request or regression. Use when asked to add PR integration tests, convert a bug fix into E2E coverage, prove existing behavior still works, map tests to the release checklist, or verify E2E reports mark checklist cases complete.
test-warp-ui
Guides testing Warp UI features and changes using the computer use tool. Use this skill only when computer-use testing was requested (explicit request or accepted offer) and the computeruse tool is available to the agent. Covers launching Warp and verifying UI behavior.