Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add TheGoat395/Codex-Skills --skill browser-inspection-workflowgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TheGoat395/Codex-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/thegoat395/codex-skills/browser-inspection-workflow)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thegoat395/codex-skills/browser-inspection-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thegoat395/codex-skills/browser-inspection-workflow/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thegoat395/codex-skills/browser-inspection-workflow"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thegoat395/codex-skills/browser-inspection-workflow.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.00336 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00168 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00067 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00034 |
Grade A, and why
browser-inspection-workflow scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Browser Inspection Workflow
Use this skill to make rendered-browser inspection a default part of shipping frontend work.
Workflow
- Inspect the affected surface, relevant project scripts, target URL and available inspection tooling; reuse existing context.
- Read Browser Inspection Workflow Guide before claiming the site is ready.
- Run the narrowest meaningful checks for the risk: visual, mobile, accessibility, performance, forms, media, SEO, analytics, deployment, or handoff.
- Fix issues when they are in scope; otherwise record exact evidence and remaining risk.
- After fixes, recheck affected rendered states; repeat broader polish only for an observed defect or unresolved quality risk.
- Summarize commands, URLs, screenshots/checks, changed files, and what was not tested.
If a native fullPage screenshot is blank, sparse, missing lower content, frozen before reveal animation, or inconsistent with the working scroll experience, do not use it as visual proof. Route the capture through $visual-regression-lab and its stitched viewport workflow.
Scoped execution
Apply the shared web contract once when execution crosses phases; reuse it if already read. Load only the specialist guidance relevant to the requested surface and deliverable.
Scope and evidence
Coordinate one route/viewport/state evidence matrix shared by QA specialists. Reuse current evidence; recheck affected coverage after relevant changes. Captures require actual visual inspection before quality claims.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago Changed · -48 tokens per session fc1e557a8acb
- 10d ago First seen · 28 lines · 61 tokens per session scan A 20125f17ea5f
browser-inspection-workflow is a skill published in the GitHub repository TheGoat395/Codex-Skills (122 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 336 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
next-cache-components-optimizer
Drive a Next.js route to instant navigation by setting up an agentic loop, under Cache Components / PPR, on initial load (hard navigation) and client-side navigation (soft navigation). Encode the goal as a failing @next/playwright instant() e2e and work it to green, one verified route at a time; the shipped test then…
playwright-component-testing
Set up component testing with Playwright using a story gallery — scaffold stories and a gallery dev page driven by the built-in mount fixture, no dedicated component-testing runtime. Use when asked to test React or Vue components in isolation with Playwright, or to migrate off @playwright/experimental-ct-react / -vue.
verify
Build/launch/drive recipe for verifying apps/docs changes at runtime (demos, docs pages, llms.txt).
playwright-cli
Automates browser interactions for testing and validating your own web applications using playwright-cli. Use when you need terminal-first browser control for navigation, form filling, screenshots, tracing, bound browser sessions, debugging, or generating Playwright test code. Only use against applications you own or…
testing-e2e
End-to-end testing patterns with Playwright — page objects, AI agent testing, visual regression, accessibility testing with axe-core, and CI integration. Use when writing E2E tests, setting up Playwright, implementing visual regression, or testing accessibility.
Accessibility Auditor
Comprehensive WCAG 2.1 AA compliance testing combining automated axe-core scans with manual keyboard navigation, screen reader compatibility, and focus management verification.