Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add TheGoat395/Codex-Skills --skill mobile-responsive-qagit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/TheGoat395/Codex-SkillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/thegoat395/codex-skills/mobile-responsive-qa)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thegoat395/codex-skills/mobile-responsive-qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thegoat395/codex-skills/mobile-responsive-qa/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thegoat395/codex-skills/mobile-responsive-qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thegoat395/codex-skills/mobile-responsive-qa.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00270 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00108 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00054 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00027 |
Grade A, and why
mobile-responsive-qa scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- seo-technical-qa — 86% identical, 16 lines differ
What it actually says
Mobile Responsive QA
Use this skill to catch mobile problems that make otherwise premium sites feel rushed.
Workflow
- Inspect the affected surface, relevant project scripts, target URL and available inspection tooling; reuse existing context.
- Read Mobile Responsive QA Guide before claiming the site is ready.
- Inspect affected phone/tablet navigation and input states: menu focus, touch affordances, virtual-keyboard occlusion, sticky controls, orientation and overflow where relevant. Distinguish emulation from real-device evidence.
- Fix issues when they are in scope; otherwise record exact evidence and remaining risk.
- Summarize commands, URLs, screenshots/checks, changed files, and what was not tested.
Scoped execution
Apply the shared web contract once when execution crosses phases; reuse it if already read. Load only the specialist guidance relevant to the requested surface and deliverable.
Scope and evidence
Record width emulation separately from real touch/device/virtual-keyboard evidence. Use $responsive-visual-polish-qa for broad breakpoint composition; do not claim real-device certification from emulation.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed ce2f5b95c013
- 1mo ago Changed · -3 lines · -48 tokens per session c70ea85dbf49
- 1mo ago First seen · 28 lines · 62 tokens per session scan A c17f385ed6c8
mobile-responsive-qa is a skill published in the GitHub repository TheGoat395/Codex-Skills (132 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 270 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
ios-simulator
Manages iOS Simulator devices and app tests with xcrun simctl: lifecycle, install/launch, push and location simulation, privacy permissions, deep links, status-bar overrides, screenshots/video, log streaming, app containers, and targetEnvironment(simulator). Use when scripting Simulator workflows, debugging…
quality-engineering-appium-mcp
Drives iOS/Android mobile devices via Appium MCP. Runs a preflight, picks local emulator/simulator/USB or a device cloud, captures screenshots/page source into a named evidence dir. Use for verifying mobile bugs, E2E tests, and navigating real device clouds (LambdaTest/BrowserStack).
common-mobile-visual-testing
Standardizes mobile UI audits, performance/scroll checks, RTL verification, and state-specific testing on iOS/Android.
android-testing
Write Android unit, Compose UI, and Hilt-integrated tests. Use when designing test behavior with MockK or coroutine test utilities; defer database/WorkManager-specific recipes to the owning feature skill.
kb-mobile-accessibility
Reference data, not a reviewer. Audit React Native, Expo, iOS, Android for accessibility. Review accessibilityLabel, accessibilityRole, accessibilityHint, touch targets (44x44pt min), screen reader support, and platform semantics.
mini-program-verification-skill
Verify mini-program implementations and fixes with risk-calibrated evidence across static checks, unit tests, integration tests, state matrices, simulators, real devices, cloud environments, and release artifacts. Use when users ask to test, validate, accept, regression-check, quality-check, confirm readiness, or…