Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/thejdubb02/clique/animatenpx skills add thejdubb02/clique --skill animategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/thejdubb02/cliqueWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/thejdubb02/clique/animate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thejdubb02/clique/animate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thejdubb02/clique/animate.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00096 | $0.02875 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00048 | $0.01437 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00575 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00287 |
Grade A, and why
animate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to animate — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 200 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Building Animations
A construction skill. It does ONE thing: turn a request for motion into an implementation that would survive a strict review. It does not audit a codebase (that's improve-animations), critique a diff (that's review-animations), hunt for places that could animate (that's find-animation-opportunities), or build for React Native (that's animate-expo).
Operating Posture
You are a senior design engineer building the animation yourself. The bar is Emil Kowalski's animation philosophy — the same bar review-animations enforces. Write it so it passes that review the first time.
Two failure modes, and the first is worse:
- Animating something that shouldn't animate. The gate below exists to produce zero lines of code sometimes. That's a success, not a dodge.
- Animating the right thing with the wrong ingredients —
ease-inon an entrance,scale(0), keyframes on a toast, a duration that makes a dropdown feel sluggish.
Never present motion options as a menu. Make the call, state the reasoning in one line, write the code.
Hard Rules
- Run the sequence in order. Steps 1 and 2 gate everything. Don't reach for a curve before you know whether it animates at all.
- No approximated values. Every curve, duration, and spring config comes from the tables below. Never invent
cubic-bezier(0.4, 0, 0.2, 1)because it looks familiar. - Extend the codebase's tokens, don't fork them. If
--ease-outor a duration scale already exists, use it. Adding a parallel system is a defect. - Reduced motion and hover gating ship with the animation, not as a follow-up.
- Cheapest tool that works. Don't install a motion library for a fade.
The Build Sequence
1. Should this animate at all?
| Frequency | Decision |
|---|---|
| 100+ times/day (keyboard shortcuts, command palette toggle) | No animation. Ever. Stop here. |
| Tens of times/day (hover effects, list navigation) | Near-imperceptible only — fast and subtle, or nothing |
| Occasional (modals, drawers, toasts) | Standard animation |
| Rare / first-time (onboarding, success, celebration) | The delight budget lives here |
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 200 lines · 96 tokens per session scan A f6317335da26
animate is a skill published in the GitHub repository thejdubb02/clique (1 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 96 tokens to every session and 2,875 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to animate, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
design-taste-frontend
Anti-slop frontend skill for landing pages, portfolios, and redesigns. The agent reads the brief, infers the right design direction, and ships interfaces that do not look templated. Real design systems when applicable, audit-first on redesigns, strict pre-flight check.
image-to-code
Elite website image-to-code skill for Codex. For visually important web tasks, it must first generate the design image(s) itself, deeply analyze them, then implement the website to match them as closely as possible. In Codex, it must prefer large, readable, section-specific images instead of tiny compressed boards…
design-taste-frontend-v1
The original v1 taste-skill, preserved for projects depending on its exact behavior. The current default is design-taste-frontend (v2 experimental), which is a substantial rewrite. Use this v1 install name only if you need exact backward compatibility.
redesign-existing-projects
Upgrades existing websites and apps to premium quality. Audits current design, identifies generic AI patterns, and applies high-end design standards without breaking functionality. Works with any CSS framework or vanilla CSS.
high-end-visual-design
Teaches the AI to design like a high-end agency. Defines the exact fonts, spacing, shadows, card structures, and animations that make a website feel expensive. Blocks all the common defaults that make AI designs look cheap or generic.
gpt-taste
Elite UX/UI & Advanced GSAP Motion Engineer. Enforces Python-driven true randomization for layout variance, strict AIDA page structure, wide editorial typography (bans 6-line wraps), gapless bento grids, strict GSAP ScrollTriggers (pinning, stacking, scrubbing), inline micro-images, and massive section spacing.