Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/thejefflarson/soundcheck/privilege-handlingnpx skills add thejefflarson/soundcheck --skill privilege-handlinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/thejefflarson/soundcheckWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/thejefflarson/soundcheck/privilege-handling)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thejefflarson/soundcheck/privilege-handling"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thejefflarson/soundcheck/privilege-handling.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00123 | $0.00963 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00062 | $0.00481 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00193 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00096 |
Grade A, and why
privilege-handling scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 56 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Privilege Handling (CWE-271, CWE-426, CWE-377, CWE-61)
What this checks
Privileged programs (SUID/SGID, root daemons, container init) operate with a credentials gap. Classic mistakes: privileges dropped in the wrong order, environment variables trusted from an attacker-controlled shell, temp files where an attacker can symlink-swap before write. Local pattern, cross-trust-boundary consequence. LSMs provide defense in depth; this catches the source-level mistake.
Vulnerable patterns
- Privileged process drops the effective UID only, leaving the saved set-user-ID intact so the process can regain root later.
- Privileged exec resolves the program name via
PATH, letting the attacker plant a lookalike earlier in the search path. - Privileged code inherits
LD_PRELOAD,LD_LIBRARY_PATH, orIFSfrom the calling environment without scrubbing them. - Process runs with no umask call (or an explicit zero umask), leaving created files world-writable.
- Temp file created via a "generate name then open" pattern (non-atomic), allowing an attacker to symlink the name in between.
- File opened in a world-writable directory without the no-follow flag, letting the attacker pre-create the path as a symlink to a privileged target.
- Multi-call binary that picks behavior based on
argv[0]without canonicalizing — the caller chooses the name viaexecve's second argument.
Fix immediately
Flag the vulnerable code and explain the risk. Then suggest a fix that establishes these properties. Translate each property into the audited file's language and operating-system API — use the platform's documented privilege, environment, and filesystem calls.
- Privilege drops set all three credential IDs explicitly and check the return. Use the call that sets real, effective, and saved IDs in one operation; verify by re-reading afterwards. Any failure is fatal — abort rather than continue with ambiguous credentials.
- Privileged execs pass an absolute path and a known environment. Do not inherit
PATH,LD_*, orIFSfrom the caller. Never use exec variants that resolve viaPATHin privileged code. - Temp files are created with an atomic open-and-create primitive that returns a file descriptor in one call — never "make a name, then open". Atomic creation closes the symlink-swap window.
- Files opened in world-writable directories pass a no-follow flag so the open fails if the final path component is a symlink. Combine with exclusive-create when the file should not pre-exist.
- The umask is set explicitly at process start to a restrictive value matching the intended file-mode policy. Do not rely on the inherited umask.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 56 lines · 123 tokens per session scan A 08e0e3751238
privilege-handling is a skill published in the GitHub repository thejefflarson/soundcheck (20 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 123 tokens to every session and 963 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
make-skill
Use this skill when sedimenting a session into a reusable workspace skill. Triggers when the user wants to turn the current conversation, workflow, or troubleshooting path into a SKILL.md. Phrases like 'turn this into a skill', 'remember how I did X', 'save this workflow', 'make a skill from this', and any /make-skill…
make-skill
用于把当前会话沉淀为可复用的 workspace skill。当用户希望把当前对话、工作流或排错路径写成 SKILL.md 时触发。触发表达包括「把这个变成 skill」「记住我是怎么做 X 的」「保存这个工作流」「make a skill from this」以及任何 /make-skill 调用。.
terraform-skill
Use when working with Terraform or OpenTofu - creating modules, writing tests (native test framework, Terratest), setting up CI/CD pipelines, reviewing configurations, choosing between testing approaches, debugging state issues, implementing security scanning (trivy, checkov), or making infrastructure-as-code…
docx
Use this skill whenever the user wants to create, read, edit, or manipulate Word documents (.docx files). Triggers include: any mention of "Word doc", "word document", ".docx", or requests to produce professional documents with formatting like tables of contents, headings, page numbers, or letterheads. Also use when…
docx
当用户需要创建、读取、编辑或处理 Word 文档(.docx)时,使用此技能。触发场景包括提到“Word 文档”、“.docx”,或要求生成带目录、标题、页码、信头等格式的专业文档;也包括提取或重组 .docx 内容、插入或替换图片、在 Word 文件中查找替换、处理修订或批注,以及将内容整理为正式 Word 文档。如果用户要求生成“报告”“备忘录”“信函”“模板”等 Word / .docx 交付物,也应使用此技能。不要用于 PDF、电子表格、Google Docs,或与文档生成无关的一般编程任务。.
multi_agent_collaboration
Use this skill when another agent's expertise or context is needed, or when the user explicitly asks to involve another agent. First list agents, then use qwenpaw agents chat for two-way communication with replies.