Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/thevibeworks/claude-code-docs/claude-automation-recommendernpx skills add thevibeworks/claude-code-docs --skill claude-automation-recommendergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/thevibeworks/claude-code-docsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/thevibeworks/claude-code-docs/claude-automation-recommender)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thevibeworks/claude-code-docs/claude-automation-recommender"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thevibeworks/claude-code-docs/claude-automation-recommender.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00077 | $0.02508 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00039 | $0.01254 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00502 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00251 |
Grade A, and why
claude-automation-recommender scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to claude-automation-recommender — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 290 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Claude Automation Recommender
Analyze codebase patterns to recommend tailored Claude Code automations across all extensibility options.
This skill is read-only. It analyzes the codebase and outputs recommendations. It does NOT create or modify any files. Users implement the recommendations themselves or ask Claude separately to help build them.
Output Guidelines
- Recommend 1-2 of each type: Don't overwhelm - surface the top 1-2 most valuable automations per category
- If user asks for a specific type: Focus only on that type and provide more options (3-5 recommendations)
- Go beyond the reference lists: The reference files contain common patterns, but use web search to find recommendations specific to the codebase's tools, frameworks, and libraries
- Tell users they can ask for more: End by noting they can request more recommendations for any specific category
Automation Types Overview
| Type | Best For |
|---|---|
| Hooks | Automatic actions on tool events (format on save, lint, block edits) |
| Subagents | Specialized reviewers/analyzers that run in parallel |
| Skills | Packaged expertise, workflows, and repeatable tasks (invoked by Claude or user via /skill-name) |
| Plugins | Collections of skills that can be installed |
| MCP Servers | External tool integrations (databases, APIs, browsers, docs) |
Workflow
Phase 1: Codebase Analysis
Gather project context:
# Detect project type and tools
ls -la package.json pyproject.toml Cargo.toml go.mod pom.xml 2>/dev/null
cat package.json 2>/dev/null | head -50
# Check dependencies for MCP server recommendations
cat package.json 2>/dev/null | grep -E '"(react|vue|angular|next|express|fastapi|django|prisma|supabase|convex|stripe)"'
# Check for existing Claude Code config
ls -la .claude/ CLAUDE.md 2>/dev/null
# Analyze project structure
ls -la src/ app/ lib/ tests/ components/ pages/ api/ 2>/dev/null
Key Indicators to Capture:
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 290 lines · 77 tokens per session scan A 441c57e26f09
claude-automation-recommender is a skill published in the GitHub repository thevibeworks/claude-code-docs (39 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 77 tokens to every session and 2,508 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to claude-automation-recommender, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
golden-chat-topics
Use when testing the goldenchattopics golden build.
golden-chat-single
Use when testing the goldenchatsingle golden build.
keep-the-why
Extract and preserve the reasoning code cannot explain - decisions, rejected alternatives, workarounds, incidents, constraints - plus project setup and maintainer interviews. Not for what changed (see Keep a Changelog) - only why.
review
Adversarial fresh-context review of an increment before it ships. Every finding cites path:line and is re-verified. Use when saying "review", "grill this", or "critique the implementation".
sw-do
Implement a SpecWeave increment task by task through the ledger, with evidence per task and a verified close. Use for "implement this", "start working", "continue the increment", "keep going".
done
Close an increment: ledger check, specweave verify, optional review, then specweave complete. Use when all tasks are done and saying "close increment", "we are done", or "finish up".