Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add Thibaultbm/claude-seo-geo --skill seo-content-comparison-pagegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Thibaultbm/claude-seo-geoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/thibaultbm/claude-seo-geo/seo-content-comparison-page)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thibaultbm/claude-seo-geo/seo-content-comparison-page"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thibaultbm/claude-seo-geo/seo-content-comparison-page/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thibaultbm/claude-seo-geo/seo-content-comparison-page"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thibaultbm/claude-seo-geo/seo-content-comparison-page.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00155 | $0.02832 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00077 | $0.01416 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00031 | $0.00566 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00283 |
Grade A, and why
seo-content-comparison-page scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 146 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Comparison, alternatives and segment pages
The last page a buyer reads before deciding. Someone searching "X vs Y" or "alternatives to X" has already accepted the category and is choosing a supplier, which makes these the highest-intent pages a site can own. They are also the format AI assistants reach for when asked to recommend something, because a page that compares options and concludes is directly usable as an answer, while a page that only praises itself is not.
Two rules make or break the whole category. The comparison must be verifiably true on the day it is published, and it must concede where a competitor genuinely wins. A page that wins every row is discounted by readers and by models, which destroys exactly the credibility the page exists to create.
Company knowledge first (Obsidian)
If the working environment contains an Obsidian vault or any local knowledge base (a folder of .md notes, often with a .obsidian directory), read it before writing: the real feature set, real pricing, the competitors that actually come up in sales calls, the objections buyers raise, and the segments the business already serves. Comparison pages assert facts about third parties, so unsourced invention is both a credibility and a legal risk. Log the pages produced to the vault's SEO action log, including the date each comparison was verified, since that date drives the refresh cycle. Structure and protocols: the obsidian-brain skill.
When to use
- Planning or writing a "X vs Y", "alternatives to X", "best X for Y" or segment page.
- Competitors, review sites or affiliates rank for "{your brand} alternatives" and you do not.
- ChatGPT, Perplexity or AI Overviews recommend competitors on comparison prompts.
- A product serves several distinct customer types and the site has one generic page for all of them.
- A category page exists but never concludes, so it converts nothing.
Phase 1: decide which pages deserve to exist
Do not build one page per competitor by default. Build the pages the market actually searches, then let the rest be sections inside them.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 146 lines · 155 tokens per session scan A de2a4712f3bb
seo-content-comparison-page is a skill published in the GitHub repository Thibaultbm/claude-seo-geo (16 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 155 tokens to every session and 2,832 once invoked, about $0.0008 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
geo-audit
Full website GEO+SEO audit with parallel subagent delegation. Orchestrates a comprehensive Generative Engine Optimization audit across AI citability, platform analysis, technical infrastructure, content quality, and schema markup. Produces a composite GEO Score (0-100) with prioritized action plan.
geo
GEO-first SEO analysis tool. Optimizes websites for AI-powered search engines (ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, Gemini, Google AI Overviews) while maintaining traditional SEO foundations. Performs full GEO audits, citability scoring, AI crawler analysis, llms.txt generation, brand mention scanning, platform-specific…
geo-brand-mentions
Brand mention and authority scanner for AI visibility. Analyzes brand presence across platforms that AI models rely on for entity recognition and citation decisions. Produces a Brand Authority Score (0-100) with platform-specific recommendations.
geo-llmstxt
Analyzes and generates llms.txt files -- the emerging standard for helping AI systems understand website structure and content. Can validate existing llms.txt files or generate new ones from scratch by crawling the site.
agent-readiness-scan
Use when a client audit, GEO/AI-visibility snapshot, or remediation re-scan needs the Cloudflare agent-readiness score from isitagentready.com — e.g. Theo client audits, "is the site agent-ready", markdown negotiation / MCP / llms.txt / Content-Signal checks, or tracking score deltas after Tier 0/1 fixes.
found-by-ai
Measure whether AI engines actually recommend a business when buyers ask. Runs the free live scan at areyoufoundbyai.com (no auth, 60s), reads the verdict and the rivals AI names instead, hands back the fix plan, and wires monitored sites into a fix-and-re-measure loop over MCP.