Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add This-HW/claude-code-kit --skill agent-teamsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/This-HW/claude-code-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/this-hw/claude-code-kit/agent-teams)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/this-hw/claude-code-kit/agent-teams"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/this-hw/claude-code-kit/agent-teams/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/this-hw/claude-code-kit/agent-teams"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/this-hw/claude-code-kit/agent-teams.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00068 | $0.01203 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00027 | $0.00481 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00241 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00120 |
Grade A, and why
agent-teams scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 104 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Agent Teams / 대규모 병렬 처리 스킬
폐기 예고 (D-7 1단계, v2.19.0) — 2.x 에서는 제거되지 않는다. 여기 담겨 있던 절차·규율은
control-loop스킬로 흡수됐다 — 결정 대 조사를 페이즈로 나누고, 워커 디스패치·검증·병합을 다룬다.claude-code-kit2.x 는 이 스킬을 끝까지 유지한다: 스킬 삭제는 그 자체로 파괴적 변경이고, 2.20.0 은 파괴적 변경 없이 닫는 최종 릴리스이기 때문이다. 실제 제거는 후속 킷hiway-kit에서 일어났다 — 거기로 옮겨 갈 때control-loop로 갈아타면 된다.
Spec 2 / W-006 업데이트: 대규모 병렬 오케스트레이션의 1순위는 이제 네이티브 dynamic workflow(
ultracode) 입니다. 실험적 자체 Agent Teams 조율은 네이티브가 흡수했으며, 이 스킬은 그 경로를 안내합니다.
사용 시점
✅ 대규모 병렬:
- Large 작업 (10개 이상 파일 변경)
- 병렬 가능한 독립 작업 (테스트 + 문서 + 구현)
- 장기 실행 작업
❌ 사용하지 않음:
- Small/Medium 작업 → auto-dev 스킬 주도 플랫 위임 (main이 Agent 병렬 dispatch)
- 순차 의존 작업 (A 완료 후 B)
오케스트레이션 모델 전체:
CLAUDE.md→ "Orchestration Model — Scale-Appropriate Primitives"
1순위: 네이티브 Dynamic Workflow (ultracode)
네이티브 워크플로우 엔진이 백그라운드에서 10~100+ 에이전트를 오케스트레이션하며, main 컨텍스트를 소비하지 않습니다.
사용자가 프롬프트에 ultracode 키워드로 트리거:
ultracode <대규모 작업 설명>
- 백그라운드 오케스트레이션 + 라이브 에이전트 카운트
- /workflows 로 실행 현황 확인
⚠️
ultracode는 사용자 대화형 트리거 전용입니다 — 스킬/비대화형에서 프로그래밍 호출이 불가합니다(2026.6 기준). 따라서 auto-dev는 Large 작업을 감지하면 청크로 분할해 안내하고, 실제 대규모 병렬은 사용자가ultracode로 시작합니다.
auto-dev와의 연계
auto-dev가 Work size: Large를 만나면:
- 독립 청크로 분할 (blockedBy 기반)
- 청크가 소수면 → 스킬 주도 병렬 dispatch
- 청크가 다수(10+)면 → 사용자에게
ultracode트리거 안내
역할 배분 가이드 (병렬 구성 참고)
| 작업 유형 | 병렬 구성 (Teammates/에이전트) |
|---|---|
| 기능 구현 | implement-code, write-tests, sync-docs |
| 리팩토링 | plan-refactor, implement-code, verify-code |
| 다관점 리뷰 | /multi-perspective-review 사용 권장 |
권장 병렬 수: 3-8개 (그 이상은 ultracode에 위임).
레거시: 실험적 Agent Teams (선택)
CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS=1 환경에서 TeamCreate + Task(team_name=...)
조합이 여전히 동작할 수 있으나, 네이티브 ultracode로 대체되었습니다. 신규 작업은
ultracode를 사용하세요. 이 경로는 하위호환을 위해서만 남아 있습니다.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +9 lines · +33 tokens per session d16315173157
- 1mo ago First seen · 95 lines · 35 tokens per session scan A 419dbe09b355
agent-teams is a skill published in the GitHub repository This-HW/claude-code-kit (4 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 68 tokens to every session and 1,203 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-standards
Prabhdeep (Sonu) Singh's personal coding standards — the house rules and quality bar for how code gets written. INVOKE before writing, generating, refactoring, or reviewing ANY code in ANY language — schemas, endpoints, queries, logging, validation, error handling — even when nobody says "standards" or "style".…
design-tree
Make design decisions as an explicit branching tree — genuine alternatives, decisive rationale, rejected branches preserved. INVOKE PROACTIVELY when planning or designing any implementation approach, or choosing between architectures, libraries, or data models — especially in plan mode. Skip trivial or forced changes…
self-review
Surface the riskiest parts of the current diff so a reviewer knows where to look hardest — one inline pass on small diffs, one cold read on a cheaper model tier with in-session synthesis on substantial ones. INVOKE PROACTIVELY whenever a change is finished and about to be handed off, reviewed, or shipped. It points…
ticket-lifecycle
The ticket-as-control-plane rulebook — the single home for the tracker-operations contract, tracker resolution, the type/priority taxonomy, human-only trigger authorization, derived status, and trust boundaries. INVOKE when reading or writing tickets in a queue-driven flow, resolving a repo's tracker, or deciding…
tdd
Test-driven development — the red-green-refactor discipline for code that's correct by design, not by accident. INVOKE PROACTIVELY whenever writing or changing code, fixing a bug, adding or structuring tests, or choosing what to mock — even when nobody says "TDD" or "tests". (Tests are code held to…
pr-conventions
Author PR descriptions from the right per-change-type template (the repo's own PULLREQUESTTEMPLATE wins), embed issue-tracker links, keep the description current as fixes land, and reply to human and bot review threads. INVOKE when opening or updating a PR or responding to reviewer comments — inside /sonu:ship or…