Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add This-HW/claude-code-kit --skill brainstorminggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/This-HW/claude-code-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/this-hw/claude-code-kit/brainstorming)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/this-hw/claude-code-kit/brainstorming"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/this-hw/claude-code-kit/brainstorming/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/this-hw/claude-code-kit/brainstorming"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/this-hw/claude-code-kit/brainstorming.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00043 | $0.01062 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00017 | $0.00425 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00009 | $0.00212 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00106 |
Grade A, and why
brainstorming scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 110 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Brainstorming
설계 승인 없이 plan-task를 invoke하거나 코드를 작성하면 안 됩니다.
체크리스트
진입 즉시 ToolSearch("select:TaskCreate,TaskUpdate,TaskList")로 Task 도구를 로드한 후,
Task 도구가 없으면 멈추지 말고 대체 경로로 간다 —
ToolSearch가 Task 계열을 반환하지 않는 호스트/세션이 있다(F-038). 그때는./scripts/checklist.sh기반 durable checklist로 추적한다. 규율 SSOT:skills/plan-task/references/task-tools-fallback.md. 아래 항목 각각에 대해 TaskCreate를 실행하세요.
Task 네이밍 규약: [Brainstorm] {항목명} (plan-task의 [Planning] Task와 구분)
완료 마킹 규약 [건너뛰기 금지]: 각 항목을 마치면 즉시 TaskUpdate(status="completed"),
마지막 항목(plan-task invoke)은 invoke 직전에 마킹 (규율 SSOT:
rules/definition-of-done.md#task-마감-규율).
work_id metadata: brainstorming 단계에서는 Work ID가 없으므로 {"phase": "brainstorming"}만 사용
- 프로젝트 컨텍스트 파악 (파일, 최근 커밋, docs)
- 명확화 질문 (한 번에 하나씩)
- 2-3가지 접근법 + 추천
- 설계 제시 및 사용자 승인
- 스펙 문서 작성 (
docs/specs/YYYY-MM-DD-{topic}.md) - 스펙 자가 검토 (플레이스홀더, 모순, 모호성)
- 사용자 스펙 검토 대기
plan-taskinvoke
프로세스
1단계: 컨텍스트 파악
- 관련 파일, README, 최근 커밋 확인
- 규모 판단: 복수의 독립 서브시스템이면 분해 먼저 제안
2단계: 명확화 질문
- 한 번에 하나의 질문만
- 목적, 제약, 성공 기준에 집중
- 가능하면 객관식 선택지 제공
3단계: 접근법 제안
- 2-3가지 접근법과 트레이드오프
- 추천안과 이유를 먼저 제시
4단계: 설계 제시
- 각 섹션을 순서대로 제시하고 승인 확인
- 아키텍처, 컴포넌트, 데이터 흐름, 에러 처리, 테스트 전략 포함
- 수정 요청 시 해당 섹션 재작성
5단계: 스펙 문서 작성
저장 경로: docs/specs/YYYY-MM-DD-{topic}.md
(docs/works/ 있으면 해당 Work와 연결)
스펙 문서 구조:
# {Topic} 설계
**Goal:** [한 문장]
**Architecture:** [2-3 문장]
## 요구사항
## 접근 방식
## 컴포넌트 구조
## 데이터 흐름
## 에러 처리
## 테스트 전략
## 범위 외
6단계: 자가 검토
- 플레이스홀더 스캔: TBD, TODO, 미완성 섹션 → 즉시 수정
- 일관성: 섹션 간 모순 없는지 확인
- 범위: 단일 plan으로 구현 가능한가?
- 모호성: 두 가지로 해석 가능한 요구사항 → 명확화
7단계: 사용자 검토 대기
세션 경계 주의: 이 단계에서 세션이 끝나면 대기 태스크가 다음 세션에 잔존한다 — 정상이다. 재개 판단 기준은
docs/specs/의 스펙 파일 (rules/task-resume.md 참고).
스펙을 `{path}`에 저장했습니다. 검토 후 수정 사항이 있으면 말씀해 주세요.
승인되면 plan-task로 넘어갑니다.
수정 요청 시 → 수정 후 자가 검토 재실행 승인 시 → 8단계
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed 0fe9cc0b4f4d
- 1mo ago First seen · 110 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 119c35a9277b
brainstorming is a skill published in the GitHub repository This-HW/claude-code-kit (4 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 1,062 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
code-standards
Prabhdeep (Sonu) Singh's personal coding standards — the house rules and quality bar for how code gets written. INVOKE before writing, generating, refactoring, or reviewing ANY code in ANY language — schemas, endpoints, queries, logging, validation, error handling — even when nobody says "standards" or "style".…
design-tree
Make design decisions as an explicit branching tree — genuine alternatives, decisive rationale, rejected branches preserved. INVOKE PROACTIVELY when planning or designing any implementation approach, or choosing between architectures, libraries, or data models — especially in plan mode. Skip trivial or forced changes…
self-review
Surface the riskiest parts of the current diff so a reviewer knows where to look hardest — one inline pass on small diffs, one cold read on a cheaper model tier with in-session synthesis on substantial ones. INVOKE PROACTIVELY whenever a change is finished and about to be handed off, reviewed, or shipped. It points…
ticket-lifecycle
The ticket-as-control-plane rulebook — the single home for the tracker-operations contract, tracker resolution, the type/priority taxonomy, human-only trigger authorization, derived status, and trust boundaries. INVOKE when reading or writing tickets in a queue-driven flow, resolving a repo's tracker, or deciding…
tdd
Test-driven development — the red-green-refactor discipline for code that's correct by design, not by accident. INVOKE PROACTIVELY whenever writing or changing code, fixing a bug, adding or structuring tests, or choosing what to mock — even when nobody says "TDD" or "tests". (Tests are code held to…
pr-conventions
Author PR descriptions from the right per-change-type template (the repo's own PULLREQUESTTEMPLATE wins), embed issue-tracker links, keep the description current as fixes land, and reply to human and bot review threads. INVOKE when opening or updating a PR or responding to reviewer comments — inside /sonu:ship or…