Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add skills/this-hw/claude-code-kit/multi-perspective-reviewnpx skills add This-HW/claude-code-kit --skill multi-perspective-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/This-HW/claude-code-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/this-hw/claude-code-kit/multi-perspective-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/this-hw/claude-code-kit/multi-perspective-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/this-hw/claude-code-kit/multi-perspective-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00027 | $0.03552 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.01776 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00710 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00355 |
Grade A, and why
multi-perspective-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 408 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
multi-perspective-review: 다관점 협업 리뷰
Deliberation Pattern 기반 문서 검토 10개 관점의 전문가가 의견 교류하며 합의 도출
개요
이 스킬은 복잡한 기획/설계 문서를 여러 관점의 전문가가 협업하여 검토합니다. 단순 체크리스트가 아닌, 의견 교류와 합의 도출 과정을 통해 깊이 있는 리뷰를 제공합니다.
핵심 특징:
- ✅ 10개 관점: Requirements, Technical, Security, UX, Business Logic, Dependencies, Code Quality, Metrics, Data/Schema, Devil's Advocate
- ✅ 3-Round Deliberation: 초기 의견 → 상호 검토 → 합의 도출
- ✅ 충돌 해결: 관점 간 상충 의견을 트레이드오프 분석으로 해결
- ✅ 영향도 분석: 변경사항의 시스템 전체 영향 평가
- ✅ 최종 합의안: Critical/Important/Nice-to-have 분류 + 액션 아이템
10개 관점 (Perspectives)
| 관점 | 역할 | 관련 에이전트 | 포커스 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Requirements | 기획자 | clarify-requirements | P0 모호함, 엣지 케이스, 비기능 요구사항 |
| Technical | 개발자 | plan-implementation | 기술적 실현가능성, 개발 기간, 시스템 충돌 |
| Security | 보안 | security-scan | 인증/권한, 민감 데이터, 공격 벡터 |
| UX/Flow | UX 디자이너 | design-user-journey | 사용자 흐름, 상호작용, 접근성 |
| Business Logic | 비즈니스 분석가 | define-business-logic | 비즈니스 규칙, 도메인 로직, 정책 |
| Dependencies | 아키텍트 | analyze-dependencies | 외부 연동, 라이브러리, 시스템 간 의존성 |
| Code Quality | 리뷰어 | review-code | 코드 품질, 유지보수성, 테스트 가능성 |
| Metrics | 데이터 엔지니어 | define-metrics | 성능 지표, 모니터링, SLA |
| Data/Schema | DB 설계자 | design-database | 스키마 설계, 데이터 모델, 마이그레이션 |
| Devil's Advocate | 전략 비평가 | devils-advocate | 실패 시나리오, 설계 약점, 리스크 정량화 |
워크플로우 (3-Round Deliberation)
┌──────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Round 0: Facilitation (사전 준비) │
│ → Facilitator가 문서 분석 │
│ → 필요한 관점 식별 │
│ → 각 관점의 초점 영역 정의 │
│ → common_context_files 출력 │
└──────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌──────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Context 수집 (메인 Claude) │
│ → facilitator 결과에서 Level 1 파일 추출│
│ → CLAUDE.md 읽기 │
│ → planning-protocol.md 읽기 │
│ → Meta 에이전트용 Level 2 파일 별도 준비│
└──────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌──────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Round 1: 초기 의견 수집 (병렬) │
│ → 각 관점의 에이전트 동시 실행 │
│ → Level 1 Context를 prompt에 포함 │
│ → Meta 에이전트는 Level 2도 포함 │
│ → 독립적 의견 도출 │
│ → Synthesizer가 종합 (중복/충돌 식별) │
└──────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌──────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Round 2: 상호 검토 (순차) │
│ → Round 1 의견을 컨텍스트로 포함 │
│ → 다른 관점 의견 고려하여 재검토 │
│ → 추가 이슈 식별 및 충돌 제안 │
└──────────────────────────────────────────┘
↓
┌──────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Round 3: 합의 도출 │
│ → Consensus-Builder가 충돌 분석 │
│ → 트레이드오프 제시 │
│ → 합의안 도출 (필요시 사용자 질문) │
│ → Impact-Analyzer가 영향도 분석 │
│ → Synthesizer가 최종 리포트 작성 │
└──────────────────────────────────────────┘
What ships with it
4 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 408 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 34fc2179ea18
multi-perspective-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository This-HW/claude-code-kit (4 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 3,552 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other skills, from other repositories
foundry-config-setup
Resolve missing setup caused by a hardcoded Foundry project endpoint or model in a sample. Use when a sample fails because it uses a placeholder/hardcoded projectendpoint (for example "https://your-project.services.ai.azure.com") or a hardcoded model instead of reading them from the environment.
haiku
When writing a haiku for this bot, follow these conventions.
deploy-docker-compose
Run the Omnigent server as a Docker compose stack (server + Postgres) on any Docker host — your laptop, a VPS, EC2 by hand, or as the base layer of any container-platform deploy. Invoke when the user wants to build the image, bring up the compose stack, debug the stack on a host they already have, or extend the stack…
azure-mgmt-botservice-dotnet
Azure Resource Manager SDK for Bot Service in .NET. Management plane operations for creating and managing Azure Bot resources, channels (Teams, DirectLine, Slack), and connection settings. Triggers: "Bot Service", "BotResource", "Azure Bot", "DirectLine channel", "Teams channel", "bot management .NET", "create bot".
dogfood
Systematically explore and test a mobile app on iOS/Android with agent-device to find bugs, UX issues, and other problems. Use when asked to dogfood, QA, exploratory test, find issues, bug hunt, or test this app on mobile.
mochi-remind
Handle due reminders — notify the user with natural language and mark them done.