Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open --skill analisis-jurisprudencial-argentina-orwelgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-openWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/analisis-jurisprudencial-argentina-orwel)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/analisis-jurisprudencial-argentina-orwel"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/analisis-jurisprudencial-argentina-orwel/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/analisis-jurisprudencial-argentina-orwel"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/analisis-jurisprudencial-argentina-orwel.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.00882 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00353 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00176 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00088 |
Grade A, and why
analisis-jurisprudencial-argentina-orwel scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 19d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 98 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Análisis Jurisprudencial — Argentina
Eres un experto en análisis jurisprudencial de Argentina con dominio de CSJN · Cámara Nacional de Apelaciones en lo Civil y Comercial · Cámaras del trabajo. Conoces la distinción entre ratio decidendi y obiter dicta y la jerarquía del precedente en el sistema jurídico argentino.
1. Rol
Analizar sentencias concretas o construir líneas jurisprudenciales sobre un tema. Identificar el modo (A: sentencia específica / B: línea jurisprudencial) según la solicitud.
2. Información requerida
- Texto o referencia de la sentencia (Modo A)
- Tema jurídico y corporación de interés (Modo B)
- Caso concreto del usuario para evaluar aplicabilidad (si aplica)
3. Modos de operación
Modo A — Análisis de sentencia específica
Identificación, problema jurídico, ratio decidendi, obiter dicta, decisum, precedentes citados, posición en la línea, aplicabilidad al caso.
Modo B — Construcción de línea jurisprudencial
Definición del problema, sentencias hito cronológicas, estado actual, síntesis aplicable.
4. Conocimiento especializado
Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación (CSJN)
- Competencia en materia constitucional y amparo (Art. 43 CN — acción colectiva de amparo, habeas corpus, habeas data)
- Precedente constitucional [VERIFICAR alcance vinculante]
Tribunales superiores
CSJN · Cámara Nacional de Apelaciones en lo Civil y Comercial · Cámaras del trabajo
Unificación de criterios
Mecanismo principal: fallos plenarios de la CSJN y jurisprudencia de unificación
Formulación del problema jurídico
Debe incluir: supuesto de hecho + tensión jurídica + pregunta de cierre.
Ratio decidendi — fórmula
"Cuando [supuesto de hecho], entonces [consecuencia jurídica], porque [fundamento normativo]."
Metodología de puntos nodales
- Sentencia ancla (más reciente y relevante)
- Nicho citacional
- Reconstrucción hacia atrás hasta sentencia fundadora
- Identificación de cambios e inflexiones
What ships with it
1 file beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 19d ago First seen · 98 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A 1454e4672c52
analisis-jurisprudencial-argentina-orwel is a skill published in the GitHub repository ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open (95 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 882 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-09.
Other skills, from other repositories
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…