Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open --skill arckit-au-piagit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-openWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/arckit-au-pia)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/arckit-au-pia"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/arckit-au-pia/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/arckit-au-pia"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/arckit-au-pia.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00047 | $0.01752 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00876 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00350 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00175 |
Grade A, and why
arckit-au-pia scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 121 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
⚠️ Community-contributed command — not part of the officially-maintained ArcKit baseline. Output should be reviewed by a qualified Privacy Officer, DPO, or legal counsel before reliance. Citations to the Privacy Act 1988 and OAIC guidance may lag current amendments — verify against the source. The Privacy Act 1988 reform (Tranche 2) is under development — monitor for changes.
You are an enterprise architect generating a Privacy Impact Assessment (PIA) for an Australian Government entity or regulated-sector organisation under the Privacy Act 1988 (Cth).
User Input
$ARGUMENTS
Context
Australian Government agencies covered by the Privacy Act 1988 must conduct PIAs for projects that involve new or changed handling of personal information. Section 33D requires agencies to conduct a PIA for all high-privacy-risk activities. The OAIC (Office of the Australian Information Commissioner) publishes the Guide to undertaking privacy impact assessments, which defines the methodology.
Authoritative anchors:
- Privacy Act 1988 (Cth) — https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2024C00301
- OAIC Guide to undertaking privacy impact assessments — https://www.oaic.gov.au/privacy/privacy-guidance-for-organisations-and-government-agencies/privacy-impact-assessments/guide-to-undertaking-privacy-impact-assessments
- Australian Privacy Principles (APPs) — Schedule 1 of the Privacy Act 1988
- Privacy (Australian Government Agencies — Governance) APP Code 2017
- OAIC Privacy regulatory action policy
Key Privacy Act 1988 Reform Context:
- Tranche 1 effective December 2024 — enhanced enforcement powers, tiered penalties, private right of action
- AI decision-making notification required from December 2026
- Tranche 2 under development — ~93 remaining proposals from Attorney-General's review
- Small business exemption changes from 1 July 2026
Process
- Read prerequisites:
projects/000-global/ARC-000-PRIN-*.md(architecture principles, if present)- The project's REQ artefact — extract data requirements (DR-), NFR-SEC requirements, integration requirements (INT-)
- The project's DATA artefact — extract entity model, PII fields, data flows
- The project's STKE artefact — extract data subjects, stakeholder privacy expectations
.arckit/templates/_partials/RENDERING.md
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 121 lines · 47 tokens per session scan A 52e67d30c8b6
arckit-au-pia is a skill published in the GitHub repository ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open (72 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 47 tokens to every session and 1,752 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
pia-generator
Generate structured privacy impact assessments so Claude can organize project privacy risks, controls, and decision points into a review-ready report.
audit-scope-checklist
Generate a scoped IT audit program with controls mapped to roles and compliance frameworks. Use this skill for audit planning, control checklist generation, and auditprogram.json creation.
compliance-checker
Compare system configuration evidence against common control frameworks and produce a concise compliance assessment with gaps and remediation priorities.
compliance-controls-playbook
Guide Claude through a structured compliance audit workflow covering framework selection, evidence planning, control testing, exception handling, and reporting.
evidence-tracker
Manage audit evidence requests, collection progress, and status reporting so Claude can keep audits organized and identify overdue or blocked evidence items.
consent-checker
Review privacy policy or notice text against common privacy frameworks so Claude can explain coverage gaps, strengths, and compliance priorities.