Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open --skill arckit-uae-data-sharinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-openWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/arckit-uae-data-sharing)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/arckit-uae-data-sharing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/arckit-uae-data-sharing/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/arckit-uae-data-sharing"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/arckit-uae-data-sharing.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00046 | $0.01021 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00511 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00204 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00102 |
Grade A, and why
arckit-uae-data-sharing scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 65 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
⚠️ Community-contributed command — not part of the officially-maintained ArcKit baseline. Output should be reviewed by qualified DPO / RSSI / federal compliance counsel before reliance. Citations to UAE Cabinet / PDPL / IAS / Cybersecurity Council text may lag the current text — verify against the source.
User Request
$ARGUMENTS
You are an enterprise architect generating a Data Sharing Agreement under the UAE Government Services Data Sharing Policy ("collect once, use securely").
Process
- Read prerequisites:
projects/000-global/ARC-000-PRIN-*.md(federal principles, if present)- The project's REQ, INT, DR, DMOD, CLAS (UAE Smart Data Classification Register), and PDPL artefacts (if present)
.arckit/templates/_partials/RENDERING.md
- Read the template:
- First, check
.arckit/templates-custom/uae-data-sharing-template.md(user override) - Then,
.arckit/templates-custom/uae-data-sharing-template.md - Fallback,
.arckit/templates/uae-data-sharing-template.md
- First, check
- Use
scripts/bash/create-project.sh --json <project-name>if the project does not yet exist; otherwise locate it. - Use
scripts/bash/generate-document-id.sh DSHR --filenamefor the artefact filename. - Resolve the
<!-- DOC-CONTROL-HEADER -->marker perRENDERING.md. - Generate the following sections:
- Sharing Parties — provider entity, consumer entity, joint-controller status, service-level commitments.
- Datasets Shared — every dataset moved between parties, referenced by Dataset ID from the CLAS register, with classification level, volume, frequency, and direction.
- Lawful Basis per Share — for every share involving personal data, cite the PDPL Article 5 lawful basis (or Article 6 consent), and reference the PDPL artefact entry that justifies it.
- Federation/API Mechanism — the technical mechanism per share (REST API, event stream, file drop, federated query). State authentication, integrity, and rate-limiting controls.
- Information-Security Safeguards — encryption (transit + rest), key management, access controls, logging, and incident-response co-ordination between parties.
- Data-Subject Rights Implications — how data subject rights (access, rectification, erasure, restriction, portability, object) flow across the sharing boundary, and which party owns each obligation.
- Populate the External References section per
.arckit/references/citation-instructions.md. The 23 April 2026 UAE Cabinet meeting announcement (Government Services Data Sharing Policy) MUST appear in the Document Register with its primary URL and the verification date. - Write the artefact via the Write tool to
projects/<project-id>/<filename>. - Show only a summary to the user (one paragraph plus the count of shares per direction and any unresolved lawful-basis gaps).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 65 lines · 46 tokens per session scan A 656f0200d93f
arckit-uae-data-sharing is a skill published in the GitHub repository ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open (72 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 46 tokens to every session and 1,021 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
compliance-checker
Compare system configuration evidence against common control frameworks and produce a concise compliance assessment with gaps and remediation priorities.
compliance-controls-playbook
Guide Claude through a structured compliance audit workflow covering framework selection, evidence planning, control testing, exception handling, and reporting.
evidence-tracker
Manage audit evidence requests, collection progress, and status reporting so Claude can keep audits organized and identify overdue or blocked evidence items.
data-inventory-mapper
Map personal and sensitive data across systems so Claude can explain data flows, classifications, transfers, and privacy-relevant handling risks clearly.
data-privacy-playbook
Guide Claude through a structured data privacy audit covering discovery, notice review, rights verification, impact assessment, and reporting.
pia-generator
Generate structured privacy impact assessments so Claude can organize project privacy risks, controls, and decision points into a review-ready report.