Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open --skill arckit-uae-pdplgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-openWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/arckit-uae-pdpl)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/arckit-uae-pdpl"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/arckit-uae-pdpl/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/arckit-uae-pdpl"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/arckit-uae-pdpl.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00065 | $0.01112 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00026 | $0.00445 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00222 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00111 |
Grade A, and why
arckit-uae-pdpl scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 68 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
⚠️ Community-contributed command — not part of the officially-maintained ArcKit baseline. Output should be reviewed by qualified DPO / RSSI / federal compliance counsel before reliance. Citations to UAE Cabinet / PDPL / IAS / Cybersecurity Council text may lag the current text — verify against the source.
User Request
$ARGUMENTS
You are an enterprise architect generating a UAE PDPL Compliance Assessment for a federal entity.
Process
- Read prerequisites:
projects/000-global/ARC-000-PRIN-*.md(federal principles, if present)- The project's REQ, DR, and DMOD artefacts (if present)
.arckit/templates/_partials/RENDERING.md
- Read the template:
- First, check
.arckit/templates-custom/uae-pdpl-template.md(user override) - Then,
.arckit/templates-custom/uae-pdpl-template.md - Fallback,
.arckit/templates/uae-pdpl-template.md
- First, check
- Use
scripts/bash/generate-document-id.sh PDPL --filenamefor the artefact filename. - Resolve the
<!-- DOC-CONTROL-HEADER -->marker perRENDERING.md. - Generate the following sections:
- Scope — what processing is covered, what carve-outs apply. Note free-zone regimes DIFC DPL and ADGM DPR are out of scope of the federal PDPL; healthcare data may also fall under ADHICS.
- Lawful basis register — per processing activity, citing PDPL Article 5 (lawful processing) and Article 6 (consent).
- Data subject rights procedure — access, rectification, erasure, restriction, portability, object, withdraw consent, complain to the Data Office. State the channel, the response SLA, and the operational owner for each right.
- DPIA — assess each PDPL Article 21 trigger (new technology, large-scale processing, profiling/automated decisions, systematic monitoring, sensitive categories under Article 7). For each triggered category, document the impact assessment, the residual risk, and the operational mitigations.
- Cross-border transfer log — assess each transfer against PDPL Article 22 (adequate countries) and Article 23 (derogations / SCC-equivalent). Note transfers to countries without a UAE adequacy designation require a written agreement and an explicit derogation.
- Breach notification playbook — PDPL Article 9 obligations to the Data Office and to affected data subjects, with applicable timelines and the operational owner.
- Penalties (informational only) — reference current administrative fines per the relevant Cabinet Resolution. This section is informational and is not used for compliance scoring.
- Populate the External References section per
.arckit/references/citation-instructions.md. Federal Decree-Law No. 45 of 2021 MUST appear in the Document Register with its primary URL and the verification date. - Write the artefact via the Write tool to
projects/<project-id>/<filename>. - Show only a summary to the user (one paragraph plus the headline DPIA outcome and any cross-border transfers flagged).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 68 lines · 65 tokens per session scan A 5b060a8aeea4
arckit-uae-pdpl is a skill published in the GitHub repository ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open (95 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 65 tokens to every session and 1,112 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…