assess-australian-data-breach-l0cka

assess-australian-data-breach-l0cka is a skill for Codex from ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open. It costs 135 tokens per session (2,050 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A triage workflow for suspected Australian privacy or cybersecurity incidents, prepared for a lawyer’s review. It records facts and unknowns, identifies potentially relevant breach rules and highlights urgent escalation needs.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to assess suspected breaches, preserve a clear fact record, identify possible reporting regimes and flag active compromise, disruption or running legal clocks for urgent human attention.
Why use it?
A security incident is not automatically a legally reportable data breach, and several regimes may apply with different deadlines. This helps organise the assessment without taking unauthorised response or notification actions.

Skill for Codex

Written for Codex: agents/openai.yaml present. Also seen: $skill-name invocation.

Good fit Use it to assess suspected breaches, preserve a clear fact record, identify possible reporting regimes and flag active compromise, disruption or running legal clocks for urgent human attention.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/assess-australian-data-breach-l0cka
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open --skill assess-australian-data-breach-l0cka
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Made for: Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for assess-australian-data-breach-l0cka

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/assess-australian-data-breach-l0cka/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/assess-australian-data-breach-l0cka)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/assess-australian-data-breach-l0cka"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/assess-australian-data-breach-l0cka/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for assess-australian-data-breach-l0cka

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/assess-australian-data-breach-l0cka"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/assess-australian-data-breach-l0cka.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 135 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,050 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00135 $0.02050
Opus 5.5 $0.00054 $0.00820
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00027 $0.00410
Haiku 4.5 $0.00014 $0.00205

Measured 22d ago against content hash e593b232fba9, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

assess-australian-data-breach-l0cka scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 22d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

au/data-protection/skills/assess-australian-data-breach-l0cka/SKILL.md · 181 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 181 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Assess Australian Data Breach

Prepare a privileged-workstream-ready preliminary assessment for a lawyer. Do not conclude that a breach is notifiable merely because a security incident occurred, and do not delay urgent human escalation while researching.

Read references/breach-assessment-method.md before starting. It defines the fact schema, regime prompts, deadline controls and source rules.

Workflow

  1. Escalate and protect.
    • Flag immediate safety, ongoing compromise, destructive activity, material service disruption or an apparently running statutory clock for urgent human attention.
    • Ask only for the minimum de-identified facts. Do not request credentials, live malware, exploit code, unnecessary identifiers or complete datasets.
    • Do not take containment action, contact a threat actor, make a payment, notify a person or regulator, or submit a report. Preserve the lawyer's approval boundary and the forensic evidence-preservation plan.
  2. Establish the incident record.
    • Separate known facts, source of each fact, estimates, inferences, assumptions, disputed facts and unknowns.
    • Record detection and awareness times with timezone; suspected occurrence window; systems and custodians; data types and protections; affected and potentially affected people; location; actors; containment/remediation; recipients; vendors; critical services; ransom demand or payment; and existing notices.
    • Do not equate detection, confirmation, containment, assessment completion or occurrence. Record each timestamp independently.
  3. Map candidate regimes.
    • Test the Privacy Act Notifiable Data Breaches scheme and each applicable State, Territory, health, critical-infrastructure, cyber-extortion, telecommunications, financial-services or contractual regime.
    • Distinguish mandatory notice, assessment duties, voluntary reports, contractual notice, insurance conditions and internal escalation.
    • Treat numerical thresholds, triggering knowledge standards, recipients, content requirements and time periods as propositions requiring current verification.
    • Invoke $route-australian-privacy-jurisdiction for every State or Territory nexus and $map-australian-cyber-incident-obligations for the concurrent Commonwealth and sectoral matrix.
  4. Verify law and calculate cautiously.
    • Invoke $check-commonwealth-legislation for every material Commonwealth title or provision and the relevant incident date. Invoke $check-nsw-legislation for every material NSW title or provision.
    • Invoke $check-australian-privacy-principles when security, retention, use, disclosure or another APP issue is material. Keep this Schedule 1 check separate from verification of the Notifiable Data Breaches scheme. A detected or unverified APP-framework change blocks the APP conclusion, but must not delay urgent containment or independently verified incident duties.
    • Invoke $assess-statutory-privacy-tort independently of APP coverage when intentional or reckless intrusion, surveillance, misuse, disclosure or publication may be material.
    • For another State or Territory, inspect its official legislation source. If a version or commencement point cannot be established, use NOT VERIFIED and escalate the check.
    • Calculate a deadline only after verifying the trigger, period, counting rule and relevant facts. Show the trigger time, timezone, calculation and uncertainty. Never invent a date from an incomplete record.
    • State that case law was not considered. Do not search for or rely on it.
  5. Assess and hand off.
    • Address reasonable-likelihood, serious-harm, remedial-action and multi-entity issues only against verified text and stated facts.
    • Build one row per possible obligation. Give the earliest plausible deadline prominence without describing an uncertain date as final.
    • Identify the decision owner, evidence needed and next action. Reserve all notification and legal conclusions for a lawyer and authorised incident lead.

Read the full file on GitHub · 181 lines

Files

What ships with it

3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 22d ago First seen · 181 lines · 135 tokens per session scan A e593b232fba9

Subscribe to this mod's changes

assess-australian-data-breach-l0cka is a skill published in the GitHub repository ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open (95 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 135 tokens to every session and 2,050 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-06.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

local-ai-agents

Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…

microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners · 200 tokens

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens

insight-error-page

Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…

vercel/next.js · 83 tokens