Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open --skill children-profiling-limitsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-openWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/children-profiling-limits)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/children-profiling-limits"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/children-profiling-limits/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/children-profiling-limits"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/children-profiling-limits.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00076 | $0.03360 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00038 | $0.01680 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00672 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00336 |
Grade A, and why
children-profiling-limits scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
95% identical to children-profiling-limits — 22 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 188 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Children's Profiling Restrictions
Overview
Profiling of children is subject to heightened restrictions under multiple regulatory frameworks. GDPR Recital 71 states that automated decision-making including profiling "should not concern a child." The UK AADC Standard 12 requires profiling to be switched off by default for child users, with exceptions only where the controller can demonstrate a compelling reason and appropriate protective measures. The EU Digital Services Act (DSA) Article 28(2) explicitly prohibits online platforms from presenting targeted advertising based on profiling using the personal data of minors. COPPA prohibits the collection of persistent identifiers from children for behavioural advertising without verifiable parental consent. This skill establishes a comprehensive framework for lawful and ethical data processing that avoids prohibited profiling of children.
Legal Framework
GDPR Recital 71 — Children and Automated Decisions
"In any case, such processing should be subject to suitable safeguards, which should include specific information to the data subject and the right to obtain human intervention, to express his or her point of view, to obtain an explanation of the decision reached after such assessment and to challenge the decision. Such measure should not concern a child."
The EDPB interprets "should not concern a child" as a strong presumption against subjecting children to automated decision-making based on profiling that produces legal or similarly significant effects. While "should not" is weaker than "shall not," the EDPB guidance and DPA enforcement practice treat this as an effective prohibition unless exceptional circumstances apply.
GDPR Article 22 — Automated Individual Decision-Making
Art. 22(1): "The data subject shall have the right not to be subject to a decision based solely on automated processing, including profiling, which produces legal effects concerning him or her or similarly significantly affects him or her."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 188 lines · 76 tokens per session scan A 0cbcbac6bccd
children-profiling-limits is a skill published in the GitHub repository ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open (72 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 76 tokens to every session and 3,360 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 95% identical to children-profiling-limits, differing in 22 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
compliance-checker
Compare system configuration evidence against common control frameworks and produce a concise compliance assessment with gaps and remediation priorities.
compliance-controls-playbook
Guide Claude through a structured compliance audit workflow covering framework selection, evidence planning, control testing, exception handling, and reporting.
evidence-tracker
Manage audit evidence requests, collection progress, and status reporting so Claude can keep audits organized and identify overdue or blocked evidence items.
data-inventory-mapper
Map personal and sensitive data across systems so Claude can explain data flows, classifications, transfers, and privacy-relevant handling risks clearly.
data-privacy-playbook
Guide Claude through a structured data privacy audit covering discovery, notice review, rights verification, impact assessment, and reporting.
pia-generator
Generate structured privacy impact assessments so Claude can organize project privacy risks, controls, and decision points into a review-ready report.