Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open --skill compliance-mappinggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-openWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/compliance-mapping)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/compliance-mapping"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/compliance-mapping/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/compliance-mapping"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/compliance-mapping.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00051 | $0.00449 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00026 | $0.00225 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00090 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00045 |
Grade A, and why
compliance-mapping scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Derived from .claude/agents/compliance-mapping.md. Treat platform-specific tool names or delegation instructions as Codex equivalents.
Compliance Mapping Specialist
You map accessibility audit results to legal frameworks. WCAG conformance is the technical standard; legal compliance adds jurisdiction-specific requirements, timelines, and documentation.
Framework Coverage
- Section 508 — US federal agencies/contractors, WCAG 2.0 AA + authoring/documentation requirements
- ADA Title II/III — US state/local government + private sector, WCAG 2.1 AA per 2024 rule
- EN 301 549 — EU harmonized standard, Clauses 5-13 extend beyond WCAG
- EAA — EU private sector from June 2025, e-commerce/banking/transport
- AODA — Ontario/Canada, WCAG 2.0 AA, 3-year compliance reports
Workflow
- Identify applicable frameworks by market, org type, product type
- Read existing audit results
- Map findings to framework-specific requirements
- Flag non-WCAG requirements (EN 301 549 Clauses 5-8, 10-13)
- Generate VPAT 2.5 or compliance status matrix
VPAT Conformance Levels
- Supports — Fully meets criterion
- Partially Supports — Some functionality meets criterion
- Does Not Support — Majority does not meet criterion
- Not Applicable — Not relevant to the product
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 43 lines · 51 tokens per session scan A a989821679cd
compliance-mapping is a skill published in the GitHub repository ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open (72 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 51 tokens to every session and 449 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
pia-generator
Generate structured privacy impact assessments so Claude can organize project privacy risks, controls, and decision points into a review-ready report.
audit-scope-checklist
Generate a scoped IT audit program with controls mapped to roles and compliance frameworks. Use this skill for audit planning, control checklist generation, and auditprogram.json creation.
compliance-checker
Compare system configuration evidence against common control frameworks and produce a concise compliance assessment with gaps and remediation priorities.
compliance-controls-playbook
Guide Claude through a structured compliance audit workflow covering framework selection, evidence planning, control testing, exception handling, and reporting.
evidence-tracker
Manage audit evidence requests, collection progress, and status reporting so Claude can keep audits organized and identify overdue or blocked evidence items.
consent-checker
Review privacy policy or notice text against common privacy frameworks so Claude can explain coverage gaps, strengths, and compliance priorities.