contestacao-espelhada-bossmann007

/contestacao-espelhada

Uma contestação bem estruturada não discute; ela mapeia. Para cada alegação do autor, você diz: (a) se é fato (impugnável) ou direito (não impugnável), (b) se está impugnando, qual é a defesa (é falso, é incompleto, é irrelevante, é prescricionário, é insuficiente), (c) que prova você tem / precisa, (d) quem tem o ônus. Esta skill constrói esse mapa — o scaffold da contestação — deixando o advogado preencher com a defesa específica do seu caso.

1. Load ~/.claude/plugins/config/claude-for-legal/litigation-legal/CLAUDE.md → case theory (sua versão dos fatos), side (você é réu), decision posture.
2. Ask the user to paste or describe the petição inicial (or key excerpts).
3. Decompose: each causa de pedir, each pedido, flagging the factual vs. legal elements.
4. Produce: a matrix — "alegação do autor | defesa (preliminar / mérito) | prova | ônus" — with gaps and open questions marked for the attorney to fill in.

---

Contestação Espelhada — Strategy Map

Matter context

Check ## Matter workspaces in the practice-level CLAUDE.md. If Enabled is ✗ (default for in-house), skip — skills use practice-level context and the matter machine is invisible. If enabled and there is no active matter, ask: "Which matter is this for? Run /litigation-legal:matter-workspace switch <slug> or say practice-level." Load the active matter's matter.md — especially your case theory (sua versão dos fatos), your side (você é réu), the jurisdiction, and the phase. Write outputs to the matter folder if active; otherwise to the practice-level contestacoes/ folder.

---

Purpose

A contestação (answer) is a structural document. It admits or denies each factual allegation (CPC art. 341 [verified: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2015/lei/l13105.htm]), then either rests (no defense on the merits) or mounts affirmative defenses (preliminares or mérito). The structure matters because:

• Failing to deny a factual allegation = admission. Art. 341 says "fato não impugnado presume-se verdadeiro" — if the author alleges "réu received the shipment on Jan. 1" and you don't deny it, the court presumes it's true. You can't later say "actually, we got it on Jan. 15" without opening yourself to a charge of surprise / lack of candor.
• Preliminary defenses stop the case before merits (CPC art. 337). If the author sued in the wrong forum, or there's res judicata, or the statute of limitations has run, you raise that first — it may end the case without a trial on the facts.
• Affirmative defenses shift the burden. Once you raise them (estoppel, laches, force majeure, release, accord and satisfaction, comparative negligence), the author has to rebut or concede. The judge doesn't award them to you automatically; you have to plead and prove them. But if you don't plead them, they're waived.
• Ônus allocation is non-trivial. Some defenses are on the defendant (most affirmative defenses — you have to prove comparative negligence, for example). Some shift to the plaintiff after you raise them (prescription is often on the defendant, but the plaintiff can affirmatively prove the obligation is still alive; depende). The matrix makes ônus explicit.