Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open --skill de-eu-recht-abgrenzunggit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-openWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/de-eu-recht-abgrenzung)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/de-eu-recht-abgrenzung"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/de-eu-recht-abgrenzung/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/de-eu-recht-abgrenzung"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/de-eu-recht-abgrenzung.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00072 | $0.01090 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00036 | $0.00545 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00218 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00109 |
Grade A, and why
de-eu-recht-abgrenzung scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 67 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Deutsches Recht und Unionsrecht — Abgrenzung
Zweck
Dieser Skill klärt, ob und in welchem Umfang Unionsrecht im konkreten Sachverhalt anzuwenden ist. Er unterscheidet Primärrecht (AEUV, EUV, GRCh), Sekundärrecht (Verordnungen, Richtlinien, Beschlüsse) und die Wechselwirkung mit nationalem Recht. Fehler bei dieser Abgrenzung führen regelmäßig zur Prüfung der falschen Norm.
Prüfungsschritte
Schritt 1 — Liegt ein unionsrechtlich geregelter Bereich vor?
Indizien für Unionsrechtsbezug:
- Grenzüberschreitender Sachverhalt (Personen, Waren, Dienstleistungen, Kapital)
- Erwähnung von DSGVO, Produkthaftungsrichtlinie, Verbraucherrechterichtlinie, KI-VO, Lieferkettensorgfaltspflichtengesetz mit EU-Bezug, Vergaberecht
- Tätigkeit einer EU-Institution oder Bezug auf EU-Fördermittel
- Diskriminierung aufgrund verbotener Merkmale (Art. 19 AEUV, Art. 21 GRCh)
Schritt 2 — Welche Rechtsquelle gilt?
| Rechtsquelle | Geltung | Wirkung |
|---|---|---|
| AEUV / EUV (Primärrecht) | Unmittelbar, Vorrang | Höchstrangiges Unionsrecht; verdrängt nationales Recht |
| GRCh Art. 51 | Gilt bei Durchführung von Unionsrecht durch Mitgliedstaaten | Grundrechte der EU; Parallelprüfung zu GG |
| EU-Verordnung (Art. 288 Abs. 2 AEUV) | Unmittelbar und direkt anwendbar | Kein nationaler Umsetzungsakt erforderlich |
| EU-Richtlinie (Art. 288 Abs. 3 AEUV) | Nach Umsetzungsfrist; richtlinienkonforme Auslegung | Kein Horizontaleffekt zwischen Privaten (Grundsatz); Ausnahmen bei staatlicher Maßnahme |
| Beschlüsse | Nur für Adressaten verbindlich | Einzelfall |
Schritt 3 — Anwendungsvorrang
Der Anwendungsvorrang des Unionsrechts (EuGH, Rs. 6/64 — Costa/ENEL; Rs. 106/77 — Simmenthal) bedeutet: Entgegenstehendes nationales Recht wird nicht nichtig, aber im Kollisionsfall unangewendet gelassen. Nationale Gerichte sind verpflichtet, nationales Recht unionsrechtskonform auszulegen und im Kollisionsfall Unionsrecht anzuwenden.
Wichtig: Der Anwendungsvorrang gilt nicht gegenüber dem GG-Kern (Ewigkeitsgarantie Art. 79 Abs. 3 GG) — BVerfG, Solange II; Lissabon-Urteil.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 67 lines · 72 tokens per session scan A 8fb2f306afd8
de-eu-recht-abgrenzung is a skill published in the GitHub repository ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open (72 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 72 tokens to every session and 1,090 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
pia-generator
Generate structured privacy impact assessments so Claude can organize project privacy risks, controls, and decision points into a review-ready report.
audit-scope-checklist
Generate a scoped IT audit program with controls mapped to roles and compliance frameworks. Use this skill for audit planning, control checklist generation, and auditprogram.json creation.
compliance-checker
Compare system configuration evidence against common control frameworks and produce a concise compliance assessment with gaps and remediation priorities.
compliance-controls-playbook
Guide Claude through a structured compliance audit workflow covering framework selection, evidence planning, control testing, exception handling, and reporting.
evidence-tracker
Manage audit evidence requests, collection progress, and status reporting so Claude can keep audits organized and identify overdue or blocked evidence items.
consent-checker
Review privacy policy or notice text against common privacy frameworks so Claude can explain coverage gaps, strengths, and compliance priorities.