Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open --skill file-trademarkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-openWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/file-trademark)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/file-trademark"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/file-trademark/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/file-trademark"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/file-trademark.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00120 | $0.05930 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00060 | $0.02965 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00024 | $0.01186 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00593 |
Grade A, and why
file-trademark scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 355 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
申请商标
向 EUIPO(欧盟)、USPTO(美国)或 WIPO Madrid Protocol(国际)提交商标申请。本技能涵盖实际申请步骤 —— 从申请前验证到注册后监视和开源商标政策。它假定冲突筛查已通过 screen-trademark 完成。
适用场景
- 在冲突筛查清晰后准备好提交商标申请
- 在欧盟、美国或国际申请策略之间选择
- 申请欧盟商标并为后续美国申请主张优先权
- 通过 Madrid Protocol 将现有国家商标扩展到国际
- 在注册后起草开源商标使用政策
- 在审查期间响应办公室行动或异议程序
输入
- 必需:要申请的商标(文字、徽标或组合)
- 必需:商品和服务描述
- 必需:目标司法管辖区(欧盟、美国、国际或组合)
- 必需:申请人姓名和地址
- 可选:Screen-trademark 结果(冲突搜索报告)
- 可选:徽标文件(若申请图形或组合商标)
- 可选:优先权主张(在另一司法管辖区的较早申请,6 个月内)
- 可选:商业使用证明(USPTO 1(a) 基础所需)
- 可选:开源项目上下文(用于第 10 步的商标政策)
申请费用参考
| 办公室 | 基本费用 | 每类别 | 备注 |
|---|---|---|---|
| EUIPO | 850 EUR | +50 EUR(第 2 类)、+150 EUR(第 3 类+) | SME Fund:75% 退款 |
| USPTO(TEAS Plus) | $250 | 每类 | 外国申请人需要美国律师 |
| USPTO(TEAS Standard) | $350 | 每类 | 商品描述更灵活 |
| Madrid Protocol | 653 CHF | 因国家而异 | 5 年内依赖基础商标 |
步骤
第 1 步:申请前检查
在投入申请费用前验证商标已可申请。
- 确认
screen-trademark已运行:- 审查冲突搜索报告中的相同或令人混淆的相似商标
- 验证所有目标司法管辖区都包含在筛查中
- 检查筛查是最近的(理想为过去 30 天内)
- 在官方数据库中运行最终冲突检查:
- EUIPO TMview:跨所有欧盟成员国注册搜索
- WIPO Global Brand Database:国际注册
- USPTO TESS:美国联邦注册(使用结构化搜索:
"mark text"[BI]) - DPMAregister:德国国家注册(若申请欧盟,覆盖最大欧盟市场)
- 验证域名和社交媒体句柄可用或已锁定:
- 域名可用性强化独特性论点(若被挑战)
- 匹配句柄减少消费者混淆风险
- 将搜索结果记录为申请前清晰记录
预期结果: 确认目标司法管辖区中不存在阻塞商标。申请前清晰记录记录尽职调查并支持任何未来异议辩护。
失败处理: 若发现冲突商标,评估严重性:相同商标 + 相同商品 = 不要申请。相似商标 + 相关商品 = 寻求关于混淆可能性的法律咨询。若冲突仅限于单一司法管辖区,考虑仅在清晰司法管辖区申请。
第 2 步:Nice 分类选择
在 Nice 分类系统下识别正确的商品和服务类别。
- 咨询 TMclass 工具(tmclass.tmdn.org)进行类别识别:
- 输入商品/服务描述
- TMclass 建议大多数办公室接受的协调术语
- 使用 TMclass 数据库的预先批准术语减少审查延迟
- 技术和软件的常见类别:
- 第 9 类:可下载软件、移动应用、计算机硬件
- 第 35 类:广告、商业管理、SaaS 平台管理
- 第 42 类:SaaS、云计算、软件开发服务
- 第 38 类:电信、在线平台、消息服务
- 起草商品和服务描述:
- 足够具体以定义您的实际使用,但足够广泛以便未来扩展
- TEAS Plus(USPTO)要求来自 ID Manual 的术语 —— 使用预先批准的术语
- EUIPO 直接接受 TMclass 协调术语
- 平衡成本与覆盖:
- 每个额外类别增加费用(见上面的费用表)
- 在您当前使用或打算使用商标的类别中申请
- 没有使用的过广申请可能被挑战(特别是在美国)
预期结果: 一份最终的 Nice 类别列表,附每个类别的具体、预先批准的商品和服务描述。描述匹配实际业务使用。
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 355 lines · 120 tokens per session scan A b6eedae0a986
file-trademark is a skill published in the GitHub repository ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open (72 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 120 tokens to every session and 5,930 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
pia-generator
Generate structured privacy impact assessments so Claude can organize project privacy risks, controls, and decision points into a review-ready report.
audit-scope-checklist
Generate a scoped IT audit program with controls mapped to roles and compliance frameworks. Use this skill for audit planning, control checklist generation, and auditprogram.json creation.
compliance-checker
Compare system configuration evidence against common control frameworks and produce a concise compliance assessment with gaps and remediation priorities.
compliance-controls-playbook
Guide Claude through a structured compliance audit workflow covering framework selection, evidence planning, control testing, exception handling, and reporting.
evidence-tracker
Manage audit evidence requests, collection progress, and status reporting so Claude can keep audits organized and identify overdue or blocked evidence items.
consent-checker
Review privacy policy or notice text against common privacy frameworks so Claude can explain coverage gaps, strengths, and compliance priorities.