Getting it into your agent
It runs from inside its repository, so the clone comes first — what it calls does not travel with the file alone.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-opennpx agentmods add skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/food-label-reviewWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/food-label-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/food-label-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/food-label-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/food-label-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/food-label-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>- NVIDIA SkillSpector pass
What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00137 | $0.04127 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00068 | $0.02063 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00027 | $0.00825 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00014 | $0.00413 |
Grade A, and why
food-label-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 309 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
预包装食品标签合规审核
对食品标签素材进行四阶段流水线审核：版本确定与预筛 → 一般标签审核 → 营养标签审核 → 生成报告。
审核流程
输入食品标签素材（照片描述/文字/文档）
│
▼
[阶段一] 版本确定与预筛
│ 确定适用版本(2011/2025) → 识别标签类别 → 检查豁免
│
▼
[阶段二] 一般标签审核 (GB 7718)
│ 2a. 必标项完整性核查（有没有）
│ 2b. 逐项内容合规审核（对不对）
│
▼
[阶段三] 营养标签审核 (GB 28050)
│ 3a. 必标项完整性核查（有没有）
│ 3b. 逐项内容合规审核（对不对）
│
▼
[阶段四] 生成审核报告
阶段一：版本确定与预筛
读取 references/00-版本选择与适用范围.md。
执行步骤：
-
版本确定（二选一，不做对比审核）：
- 2011 版：GB 7718-2011 + GB 28050-2011
- 2025 版：GB 7718-2025 + GB 28050-2025
- 必须通过 AskUserQuestion 让用户确认适用版本，不得自行推断。 当前处于 2011→2025 过渡期，同一企业可能部分产品适用旧版、部分适用新版，版本选择直接影响审核结论，须由用户（委托方）明确指定。
-
标签类别识别（三选一）：
直接提供给消费者— 标准完整要求非直接提供给消费者(B2B)— 简化标示（仅需食品名称、净含量/规格、生产日期、保质期、贮存条件）进口预包装食品— 额外要求（原产国、进口商信息、中文标签等）
-
豁免检查：
- 一般标签小包装豁免：≤20cm²(2025) / <10cm²(2011)
- 营养标签豁免：按 references/00 中的豁免条件判定 → 豁免则跳过阶段三
- 保质期豁免：部分酒类等
输出： 版本标签 + 类别标签 + 豁免状态 + 需执行的审核模块列表
阶段二：一般标签审核 (GB 7718)
2a. 必标项完整性核查
在进入逐项审核前，先对照必标项清单，确认标签上是否存在以下法定必标项。缺失任一必标项即标记高风险。
直接提供给消费者的预包装食品：
| # | 必标项 | 2011 | 2025 | 备注 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 食品名称 | 必标 | 必标 | |
| 2 | 配料表 | 必标 | 必标 | 单一配料可豁免 |
| 3 | 净含量和规格 | 必标 | 必标 | |
| 4 | 生产者/经营者名称、地址、联系方式 | 必标 | 必标 | |
| 5 | 生产日期 | 必标 | 必标 | 部分酒类可豁免(2025) |
| 6 | 保质期 | 必标 | 必标 | 部分酒类/食醋/食盐等可豁免 |
| 7 | 贮存条件 | 必标 | 必标 | |
| 8 | 食品生产许可证编号 | 必标 | 必标 | 进口食品可豁免 |
| 9 | 产品标准代号 | 必标 | 必标 | 进口食品可豁免 |
| 10 | 致敏物质 | 推荐 | 必标 | 2025 升级为强制 |
B2B（非直接提供）：仅需 #1、#3、#5、#6、#7。
小包装豁免：按 references/00 中规定的可简化标示项目。
将缺失项全部记录后，进入 2b。
2b. 逐项内容合规审核
按固定顺序加载对应版本的 references，对每个已存在的标签项目审核内容是否合规：
| # | 审核项目 | 2011 文件 | 2025 文件 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 食品名称 | 01-食品名称-2011 | 01-食品名称-2025 |
| 2 | 配料表 | 02-配料表-2011 | 02-配料表-2025 |
| 3 | 日期与保质期 | 03-日期与保质期-2011 | 03-日期与保质期-2025 |
| 4 | 净含量与规格 | 04-净含量与规格 | 同左 |
| 5 | 生产者/经营者 | 05-生产者经营者信息-2011 | 05-生产者经营者信息-2025 |
| 6 | 贮存条件/许可证 | 06-贮存条件与许可证 | 同左 |
| 7 | 致敏物质 | 07-致敏物质-2011 | 07-致敏物质-2025 |
| 8 | 辐照/转基因 | 11-辐照与转基因 | 同左 |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 309 lines · 137 tokens per session scan A f84a40e4127b
food-label-review is a skill published in the GitHub repository ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open (72 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 137 tokens to every session and 4,127 once invoked, about $0.0007 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
pia-generator
Generate structured privacy impact assessments so Claude can organize project privacy risks, controls, and decision points into a review-ready report.
audit-scope-checklist
Generate a scoped IT audit program with controls mapped to roles and compliance frameworks. Use this skill for audit planning, control checklist generation, and auditprogram.json creation.
compliance-checker
Compare system configuration evidence against common control frameworks and produce a concise compliance assessment with gaps and remediation priorities.
compliance-controls-playbook
Guide Claude through a structured compliance audit workflow covering framework selection, evidence planning, control testing, exception handling, and reporting.
evidence-tracker
Manage audit evidence requests, collection progress, and status reporting so Claude can keep audits organized and identify overdue or blocked evidence items.
consent-checker
Review privacy policy or notice text against common privacy frameworks so Claude can explain coverage gaps, strengths, and compliance priorities.