forms-1-12-completeness-verification

forms-1-12-completeness-verification is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open. It costs 88 tokens per session (2,638 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A checklist for verifying Ontario expropriation Forms 1–12 before they are served or filed. Expropriation is the legal process of taking private property for a public purpose.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to check statutory citations, property descriptions, compensation breakdowns, notice periods, signatures, service requirements, and affidavits of service.
Why use it?
It helps find missing legal references, incorrect deadlines, incomplete compensation details, signing problems, and weak proof of service before submission.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one. Also seen: positional $N argument.

Good fit Use it to check statutory citations, property descriptions, compensation breakdowns, notice periods, signatures, service requirements, and affidavits of service.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/forms-1-12-completeness-verification
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open --skill forms-1-12-completeness-verification
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for forms-1-12-completeness-verification

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/forms-1-12-completeness-verification/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/forms-1-12-completeness-verification)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/forms-1-12-completeness-verification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/forms-1-12-completeness-verification/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for forms-1-12-completeness-verification

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/forms-1-12-completeness-verification"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/forms-1-12-completeness-verification.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 88 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 2,638 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00088 $0.02638
Opus 5 $0.00044 $0.01319
Sonnet 5 $0.00018 $0.00528
Haiku 4.5 $0.00009 $0.00264

Measured 13d ago against content hash 84533d2e77df, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

forms-1-12-completeness-verification scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

ca/real-estate/skills/forms-1-12-completeness-verification/SKILL.md · 224 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 224 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Form-Specific Checklists

Detailed verification requirements for commonly-used expropriation forms.

Form 2 (Notice of Application for Approval to Expropriate)

Checklist:

1. Statutory authority citation:

  • Enabling legislation cited (e.g., "Municipal Act, 2001, S.O. 2001, c.25, s.11")
  • Specific section authorizing expropriation identified
  • Authority name correct ("City of Toronto" not "Toronto" or "City")

2. Legal description accuracy:

  • Matches registered deed or survey
  • Includes: Lot, Concession, Plan number, Registry Division
  • Consistent with attached plan (if plan attached)
  • No typos in property identifiers (e.g., "Lot 10" not "Lot 1O")

3. Purpose statement clarity:

  • Public work described in detail ("construction of 4-lane arterial road" not "road project")
  • Purpose aligns with statutory authority (e.g., Municipal Act allows road construction)
  • Not vague or overly broad

4. Service requirements:

  • Served on registered owner(s) - all co-owners if multiple
  • Service method complies with s.11 Expropriations Act (personal service or registered mail)
  • Proof of service filed (affidavit or registered mail receipt)
  • Service date documented (critical for timeline tracking)

5. Dual signing officers (municipal expropriations):

  • Two officers signed (e.g., Mayor + Clerk, or CAO + Clerk per municipal by-law)
  • Signatures original (not photocopied or stamped)
  • Signing officers have authority per municipal by-law
  • Date of signing recorded

Example defect:

  • Form 2 submitted: Statutory authority cited as "Municipal Act, 2001"
  • Defect: Missing section number (should be "Municipal Act, 2001, s.11")
  • Risk: Approving authority may reject application for insufficient statutory authority citation
  • Correction: Amend Form 2 to add section number, re-serve on owner (resets timeline)

Form 6 (Offer to Purchase / Certificate of Approval on Expropriation Plan)

Read the full file on GitHub · 224 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 13d ago First seen · 224 lines · 88 tokens per session scan A 84533d2e77df

Subscribe to this mod's changes

forms-1-12-completeness-verification is a skill published in the GitHub repository ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open (72 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 88 tokens to every session and 2,638 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.