Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open --skill health-data-dpiagit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-openWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/health-data-dpia)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/health-data-dpia"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/health-data-dpia/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/health-data-dpia"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/health-data-dpia.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00108 | $0.02131 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00054 | $0.01066 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00426 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00213 |
Grade A, and why
health-data-dpia scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 137 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Assessing Health Data Processing
Overview
Health data is classified as a special category under GDPR Art. 9(1), requiring both a lawful basis under Art. 6(1) and an Art. 9(2) exemption for processing. Processing of health data on a large scale triggers a mandatory DPIA under Art. 35(3)(b). This skill provides a DPIA methodology for health data processing scenarios: electronic health records, clinical trials, health research, telemedicine, health applications, medical devices, and genetic data analysis.
Legal Framework
Art. 9(1) — Definition of Health Data
GDPR Art. 4(15) defines data concerning health as "personal data related to the physical or mental health of a natural person, including the provision of health care services, which reveal information about his or her health status."
This includes:
- Medical records and diagnoses
- Prescription and medication data
- Laboratory results and imaging
- Mental health assessments
- Disability information
- Genetic data (Art. 4(13))
- Biometric data processed for health purposes
- Health insurance claims
- Fitness and wellness data that reveals health status
- Data inferred from non-health data that reveals health conditions
Art. 9(2) Exemptions for Health Data
| Exemption | Reference | Application |
|---|---|---|
| Explicit consent | Art. 9(2)(a) | Patient consent for specific health processing. Must be separate from treatment consent. |
| Employment obligations | Art. 9(2)(b) | Occupational health assessments required by employment law. |
| Vital interests | Art. 9(2)(c) | Emergency medical treatment where patient cannot consent. |
| Healthcare provision | Art. 9(2)(h) | Processing necessary for preventive or occupational medicine, medical diagnosis, provision of health or social care, or management of health systems. Must be processed by or under the responsibility of a professional subject to medical secrecy. |
| Public health | Art. 9(2)(i) | Processing necessary for public health purposes including protecting against serious cross-border threats, ensuring high standards of quality and safety of health care, medicinal products, or medical devices. |
| Scientific research | Art. 9(2)(j) | Processing necessary for scientific research purposes (including clinical trials) subject to Art. 89(1) safeguards: data minimisation, pseudonymisation where possible. |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 137 lines · 108 tokens per session scan A 37ce2fc75d6d
health-data-dpia is a skill published in the GitHub repository ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open (72 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 108 tokens to every session and 2,131 once invoked, about $0.0005 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
pia-generator
Generate structured privacy impact assessments so Claude can organize project privacy risks, controls, and decision points into a review-ready report.
audit-scope-checklist
Generate a scoped IT audit program with controls mapped to roles and compliance frameworks. Use this skill for audit planning, control checklist generation, and auditprogram.json creation.
compliance-checker
Compare system configuration evidence against common control frameworks and produce a concise compliance assessment with gaps and remediation priorities.
compliance-controls-playbook
Guide Claude through a structured compliance audit workflow covering framework selection, evidence planning, control testing, exception handling, and reporting.
evidence-tracker
Manage audit evidence requests, collection progress, and status reporting so Claude can keep audits organized and identify overdue or blocked evidence items.
consent-checker
Review privacy policy or notice text against common privacy frameworks so Claude can explain coverage gaps, strengths, and compliance priorities.