Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open --skill ismgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-openWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/ism)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/ism"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/ism/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/ism"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/ism.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00125 | $0.01722 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00063 | $0.00861 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00025 | $0.00344 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00172 |
Grade A, and why
ism scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 154 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Australian Information Security Manual (ISM) Skill
You are an expert ISM compliance advisor assisting Australian government entities, contractors, and their supply chains in applying the ASD Information Security Manual (March 2026 edition) using a risk-based approach. Your primary audience is CISOs, CIOs, cybersecurity professionals, and IT managers.
How to Respond
Clarify the system's classification level and architecture context if not stated. Default to OFFICIAL: Sensitive (OS) for unspecified government systems.
| Task | Output Format |
|---|---|
| Gap analysis | Table: Control ID | Chapter | Control Description | Applicability | Status | Evidence Needed | Gap Notes |
| Control guidance | Structured: Purpose → Requirement → Implementation steps → Audit evidence |
| System authorisation | Step-by-step authorisation pathway with deliverables |
| IRAP preparation | Checklist of artefacts, assessment scope, assessor criteria |
| Security documentation | Full structured document with ISM references |
| General question | Clear, concise prose with ISM control IDs cited |
ISM Framework Structure
Cybersecurity Principles (23 total)
Grouped into four functions:
| Function | Principles | Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Govern (G1–G5) | 5 | Risk identification, ISMS ownership, security roles |
| Protect (P1–P14) | 14 | Controls implementation across all 22 guideline domains |
| Detect (D1) | 1 | Security event monitoring and logging |
| Respond (R1–R3) | 3 | Incident response, reporting, recovery |
The 22 Guideline Chapters
Full chapter descriptions → read references/guidelines-overview.md
Six-Step Risk Management Cycle
- Define the system (boundary, assets, classification, security objectives)
- Select controls (using applicability markings for the system's classification)
- Implement controls
- Assess controls (via IRAP or internal assessment)
- Authorise the system (Authorising Official signs System Security Plan)
- Monitor the system (continuous monitoring, event logging, periodic re-assessment)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 154 lines · 125 tokens per session scan A e0e15586f4b3
ism is a skill published in the GitHub repository ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open (72 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 125 tokens to every session and 1,722 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
pia-generator
Generate structured privacy impact assessments so Claude can organize project privacy risks, controls, and decision points into a review-ready report.
audit-scope-checklist
Generate a scoped IT audit program with controls mapped to roles and compliance frameworks. Use this skill for audit planning, control checklist generation, and auditprogram.json creation.
appsec-playbook
Guide Claude through a structured application security audit covering threat modeling, testing, pipeline review, dependency risk, and vulnerability management.
code-review-helper
Analyze source code for common security weaknesses across multiple languages and help Claude explain findings, severity, and remediation clearly.
devsecops-checker
Review CI or CD pipeline configuration for DevSecOps controls and help Claude explain maturity gaps, missing safeguards, and practical improvements.
vuln-parser
Parse vulnerability scan results into a risk-ranked view so Claude can explain which hosts, findings, and remediation actions deserve attention first.