Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open --skill managing-consent-for-childrengit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-openWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/managing-consent-for-children)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/managing-consent-for-children"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/managing-consent-for-children/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/managing-consent-for-children"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/managing-consent-for-children.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.02453 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.01226 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00491 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00245 |
Grade A, and why
managing-consent-for-children scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
89% identical to managing-consent-for-children — 20 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 175 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Managing Consent for Children
Overview
GDPR Article 8 establishes special rules for processing children's personal data in the context of information society services offered directly to a child. Where processing is based on consent under Article 6(1)(a), the controller must make reasonable efforts to verify that consent is given or authorized by the holder of parental responsibility over the child. Member States may set the age threshold between 13 and 16 years.
In the United States, the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA, 15 U.S.C. Section 6501-6506) requires verifiable parental consent before collecting personal information from children under 13.
Country-Specific Age Thresholds under GDPR Article 8(1)
Member States may provide by law for a lower age threshold, provided it is not below 13 years:
| Country | Age Threshold | Legal Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | 14 | Austrian Data Protection Act (DSG) Section 4(4) |
| Belgium | 13 | Law of 30 July 2018, Art. 7 |
| Croatia | 16 | GDPR default (no national derogation) |
| Czech Republic | 15 | Act No. 110/2019, Section 7 |
| Denmark | 13 | Danish Data Protection Act Section 12 |
| Estonia | 13 | Personal Data Protection Act Section 8 |
| Finland | 13 | Data Protection Act 1050/2018, Section 5 |
| France | 15 | Law No. 2018-493 (Loi Informatique et Libertés), Art. 45 |
| Germany | 16 | GDPR default (no national derogation) |
| Greece | 15 | Law 4624/2019, Art. 21 |
| Hungary | 16 | GDPR default (no national derogation) |
| Ireland | 16 | Data Protection Act 2018, Section 31 |
| Italy | 14 | Legislative Decree 101/2018, Art. 2-quinquies |
| Latvia | 13 | Personal Data Processing Law, Section 9 |
| Lithuania | 14 | Law on Legal Protection of Personal Data, Art. 5 |
| Luxembourg | 16 | GDPR default (no national derogation) |
| Netherlands | 16 | GDPR default (no national derogation) |
| Poland | 16 | GDPR default (no national derogation) |
| Portugal | 13 | Law 58/2019, Art. 16 |
| Romania | 16 | GDPR default (no national derogation) |
| Slovakia | 16 | GDPR default (no national derogation) |
| Slovenia | 16 | GDPR default (no national derogation) |
| Spain | 14 | Organic Law 3/2018, Art. 7 |
| Sweden | 13 | Data Protection Act (2018:218), Chapter 2 Section 4 |
| United Kingdom | 13 | Data Protection Act 2018, Section 9 (UK GDPR retained) |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 175 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A 2df417792c13
managing-consent-for-children is a skill published in the GitHub repository ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open (72 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 2,453 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 89% identical to managing-consent-for-children, differing in 20 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other skills, from other repositories
pia-generator
Generate structured privacy impact assessments so Claude can organize project privacy risks, controls, and decision points into a review-ready report.
audit-scope-checklist
Generate a scoped IT audit program with controls mapped to roles and compliance frameworks. Use this skill for audit planning, control checklist generation, and auditprogram.json creation.
compliance-checker
Compare system configuration evidence against common control frameworks and produce a concise compliance assessment with gaps and remediation priorities.
compliance-controls-playbook
Guide Claude through a structured compliance audit workflow covering framework selection, evidence planning, control testing, exception handling, and reporting.
evidence-tracker
Manage audit evidence requests, collection progress, and status reporting so Claude can keep audits organized and identify overdue or blocked evidence items.
consent-checker
Review privacy policy or notice text against common privacy frameworks so Claude can explain coverage gaps, strengths, and compliance priorities.