nyc-korrespondenz-und-conflict-check

nyc-korrespondenz-und-conflict-check is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open. It costs 176 tokens per session (3,207 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A legal workflow for appointing and coordinating a New York law firm in US trademark matters. It covers engagement documents, powers of attorney, conflict checks, confidentiality, fees, and communication procedures.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to set up cross-border US trademark representation, complete client and conflict checks, agree fees, protect privileged communications, and define how the firms coordinate.
Why use it?
It helps prevent conflicts of interest and unclear responsibilities when lawyers in Germany and the United States work on the same trademark case. It also records the professional and confidentiality rules involved.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to set up cross-border US trademark representation, complete client and conflict checks, agree fees, protect privileged communications, and define how the firms coordinate.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/nyc-korrespondenz-und-conflict-check
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open --skill nyc-korrespondenz-und-conflict-check
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for nyc-korrespondenz-und-conflict-check

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/nyc-korrespondenz-und-conflict-check/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/nyc-korrespondenz-und-conflict-check)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/nyc-korrespondenz-und-conflict-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/nyc-korrespondenz-und-conflict-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for nyc-korrespondenz-und-conflict-check

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/nyc-korrespondenz-und-conflict-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/nyc-korrespondenz-und-conflict-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 176 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,207 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00176 $0.03207
Opus 5 $0.00088 $0.01604
Sonnet 5 $0.00035 $0.00641
Haiku 4.5 $0.00018 $0.00321

Measured 9d ago against content hash c90a266c8891, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

nyc-korrespondenz-und-conflict-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

cross-jurisdiction/ip/skills/nyc-korrespondenz-und-conflict-check/SKILL.md · 192 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 192 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

NYC-Korrespondenz und Conflict Check — Whitman Brennan Forsythe LLP

Die Zusammenarbeit zwischen Steinacker Lichtenberg München und Whitman Brennan Forsythe LLP New York ist das transatlantische Rückgrat des klôtzzkètté-IP-Schutzes. Das Protokoll muss sitzen: Engagement Letters, Privilege-Schutz, Gebührenstruktur, Kommunikationsstandards — jeder Schritt ist juristisch und ethisch sorgfältig vorbereitet.

Partner J. Halston Whitman III, Esq. (USD 1.450/h) und Senior Associate Eleanor M. Quintero, Esq. (USD 695/h) sind klôtzzkètté Inc.'s Trademark Practice Team in NYC.

Rechtsrahmen

Deutsches Recht (Steinacker Lichtenberg)

  • BRAO §§ 43a/43b: Berufsrechtliche Pflichten; Verschwiegenheitspflicht
  • BORA §§ 1-6: Grundpflichten des Anwalts
  • § 3 BORA: Interessenkonflikt-Verbot
  • Geldwäschegesetz (GwG): Mandantenidentifizierung bei internationalem Mandat

US-Recht (Whitman Brennan Forsythe LLP)

  • ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct (MRPC): Rule 1.7 (Conflict of Interest), Rule 1.9 (Former Clients), Rule 1.6 (Confidentiality), Rule 1.5 (Fees)
  • New York Rules of Professional Conduct (NYRPC): NY-spezifische Variationen der ABA Rules (ggf. strenger)
  • FRCP 5.4: Fee-Splitting Verbot mit Non-Lawyers — keine Vergütungsabsprachen Münchener Kanzlei ↔ NYC-Kanzlei, die als Fee-Splitting erscheinen könnten
  • Attorney-Client Privilege (ACE): US-Bundesrecht; Korrespondenz zwischen Anwalt und Mandant privilegiert; gilt auch für Korrespondenz zwischen Co-Counsels (Common Interest)
  • Work Product Doctrine (Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495 (1947)): Anwalts-Arbeitsmaterialien in Erwartung von Litigation sind geschützt; in Discovery grundsätzlich nicht auszugeben
  • Common Interest Privilege: Wenn beide Kanzleien (München + NYC) gemeinsam einen Mandanten vertreten, ist ihre interne Kommunikation privilegiert (Common Interest/Joint Defense Agreement)

Prüfungsschritte

Schritt 1: Interessenkonflikt-Check (Conflict Check)

Steinacker Lichtenberg München:

  1. Mandanten-Liste prüfen: Gibt es aktive Mandate gegen klôtzzkètté oder ihre Konkurrenten (Dior, Chanel, Hermès, Gucci, Prada in denselben Klassen)?
  2. Ehemalige Mandanten: 3-Jahres-Rückblick auf abgeschlossene Mandate
  3. Persönliche Konflikte der beteiligten Anwälte: Aufsichtsrat-Mitgliedschaften, Aktienbesitz, Familie
  4. Ergebnis dokumentieren: schriftlicher Conflict-Check-Bericht, Datum, unterzeichnet

Read the full file on GitHub · 192 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 192 lines · 176 tokens per session scan A c90a266c8891

Subscribe to this mod's changes

nyc-korrespondenz-und-conflict-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open (72 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 176 tokens to every session and 3,207 once invoked, about $0.0009 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.