Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open --skill privacy-law-monitoringgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-openWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/privacy-law-monitoring)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/privacy-law-monitoring"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/privacy-law-monitoring/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/privacy-law-monitoring"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/privacy-law-monitoring.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00055 | $0.02075 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00830 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00415 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00208 |
Grade A, and why
privacy-law-monitoring scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 156 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Privacy Law Change Monitoring and Impact Assessment
Overview
Privacy law is one of the fastest-evolving regulatory domains globally. Between 2018 and 2026, over 40 countries enacted or substantially amended comprehensive data protection legislation. Organisations operating across multiple jurisdictions must systematically monitor these changes, assess their impact on operations, and prioritise implementation to maintain continuous compliance.
Monitoring Framework
Tier 1 Sources: Official Regulatory Publications
| Source Type | Examples | Monitoring Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Official gazettes | EU Official Journal, Brazil Diário Oficial da União, India Gazette, PRC State Council announcements | Daily automated monitoring |
| Regulator websites | EDPB, CNIL, ICO, ANPD, CAC, PIPC, PPC, OAIC, PDPC (Singapore), PDPC (Thailand) | Daily automated monitoring |
| Regulatory enforcement decisions | DPA decision databases, court rulings | Weekly review |
| Public consultations | Draft regulations, calls for comment | Weekly review |
Tier 2 Sources: Interpretive and Analytical
| Source Type | Examples | Monitoring Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Law firm alerts and briefings | Baker McKenzie Global Privacy Radar, DLA Piper Data Protection Laws of the World, Hogan Lovells Chronicle of Data Protection | Weekly digest |
| Industry associations | IAPP (International Association of Privacy Professionals), GPA (Global Privacy Assembly) | Weekly review |
| Academic publications | Computer Law & Security Review, International Data Privacy Law (IDPL) | Monthly review |
| Regulatory guidance and FAQs | EDPB guidelines, CNIL guides, PPC guidelines, ANPD resolutions | As published |
Tier 3 Sources: Horizon Scanning
| Source Type | Examples | Monitoring Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| Legislative tracking | National parliament agendas, EU legislative observatory, US Congressional trackers | Monthly review |
| Political and policy signals | Government policy papers, party manifestos, ministerial speeches | Quarterly review |
| International developments | UN resolutions, trade agreements with data provisions, OECD reports | Quarterly review |
| Technology developments | AI regulation proposals, biometric regulation, blockchain privacy | Quarterly review |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 156 lines · 55 tokens per session scan A 521a2c06de40
privacy-law-monitoring is a skill published in the GitHub repository ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open (95 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 55 tokens to every session and 2,075 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other skills, from other repositories
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…