recht-verbraucher-momarcode1

recht-verbraucher-momarcode1 is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open. It costs 73 tokens per session (5,575 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

An Austrian consumer-protection law guide for problems with purchases, online orders, defective goods, unfair terms, or cancellation rights. It explains the difference between a legal defect claim and a voluntary guarantee, as well as rules for distance selling.

In plain words
What is it for?
It helps assess defective-product disputes, online-purchase cancellations, unfair contract terms, and complaints against businesses or sellers.
Why use it?
It helps identify which consumer right applies, what deadlines matter, and how the buyer’s purchase method affects the available remedies.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit It helps assess defective-product disputes, online-purchase cancellations, unfair contract terms, and complaints against businesses or sellers.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/recht-verbraucher-momarcode1
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open --skill recht-verbraucher-momarcode1
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for recht-verbraucher-momarcode1

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/recht-verbraucher-momarcode1/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/recht-verbraucher-momarcode1)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/recht-verbraucher-momarcode1"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/recht-verbraucher-momarcode1/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for recht-verbraucher-momarcode1

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/recht-verbraucher-momarcode1"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/recht-verbraucher-momarcode1.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 73 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 5,575 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00073 $0.05575
Opus 5.5 $0.00029 $0.02230
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00015 $0.01115
Haiku 4.5 $0.00007 $0.00558

Measured 23d ago against content hash df8e83f6c410, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

recht-verbraucher-momarcode1 scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 23d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

at/consumer/skills/recht-verbraucher-momarcode1/SKILL.md · 354 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 354 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

/recht verbraucher — Verbraucherschutzrecht (Advisory)

When the user describes a consumer protection issue — defective goods, online purchase problems, unfair contract terms, withdrawal from distance contracts, or disputes with businesses — follow these steps exactly.


Step 1: Gather the Facts

Read everything the user has provided. You need:

  1. Who are the parties? — Verbraucher (§1 KSchG) vs. Unternehmer (§1 KSchG)? Both natural persons? Is this a B2C transaction (KSchG applies) or B2B/C2C (KSchG does NOT apply)?
  2. What was purchased? — Bewegliche Sache, Dienstleistung, digitale Inhalte (§1 VGG), digitale Dienstleistung? Neu oder gebraucht?
  3. How was it purchased? — Geschaeftslokal, Fernabsatz (§3 FAGG — Internet, Telefon), ausserhalb von Geschaeftsraeumen (§3 FAGG — Haustuergeschaeft)?
  4. When? — Kaufdatum, Lieferdatum, wann Mangel entdeckt, wann reklamiert? Alle Daten sind fristenrelevant.
  5. What is the problem? — Mangel bei Lieferung, Mangel spaeter aufgetreten, Nichtlieferung, falsche Ware, Vertragsklausel unfair, Ruecktritt verweigert?
  6. What has the user already done? — Maengelruege, schriftliche Reklamation, Ruecktrittserklärung, Kontakt mit Haendler/Hersteller?
  7. What does the user want? — Reparatur, Austausch, Preisminderung, Wandlung (Geld zurueck), Vertragsruecktritt, Schadenersatz?

If critical information is missing, ask. Be specific:

"Wann wurde die Ware geliefert? Die Gewaehrleistungsfrist beginnt mit der Uebergabe." "Haben Sie online bestellt oder im Geschaeft gekauft? Das bestimmt, ob ein 14-taegiges Ruecktrittsrecht besteht."

Do NOT begin analysis until you have enough facts.


Step 2: RIS Verification

Before proceeding with analysis, follow the RIS Verification Protocol (references/ris-protocol.md):

  1. Check RIS MCP availability
  2. For every § you cite in this analysis, verify current wording via RIS
  3. For case law references (OGH, HG Wien), retrieve via RIS Justiz
  4. Record verification status for the Quellenstatus block
  5. If RIS is unavailable, follow the fallback ladder and flag all affected citations

Read the full file on GitHub · 354 lines

Files

What ships with it

3 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 23d ago Changed · +5 lines df8e83f6c410
  2. 25d ago First seen · 349 lines · 73 tokens per session scan A 686f6e833e88

Subscribe to this mod's changes

recht-verbraucher-momarcode1 is a skill published in the GitHub repository ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open (95 stars, last pushed 14d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 73 tokens to every session and 5,575 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-02.

Related

Other skills, from other repositories

local-ai-agents

Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…

microsoft/ai-agents-for-beginners · 200 tokens

systematic-debugging

Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.

obra/superpowers · 21 tokens

next-cache-components-adoption

Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…

vercel/next.js · 95 tokens

chat-pet-sprite-creation

Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.

microsoft/vscode · 53 tokens

cpu-profile-analysis

Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…

microsoft/vscode · 71 tokens

insight-error-page

Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…

vercel/next.js · 83 tokens