Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open --skill transparenz-checkgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-openWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/transparenz-check)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/transparenz-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/transparenz-check/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/transparenz-check"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/transparenz-check.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00049 | $0.01053 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00024 | $0.00526 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00211 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00105 |
Grade A, and why
transparenz-check scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 13d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 124 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Transparenz Check — Oesterreichisches Recht
Zweck
Prueft die oeffentlich sichtbaren Rechtsinformationen der Website auf Vollstaendigkeit und Korrektheit.
1. Impressum (ECG § 5 + § 14 UGB)
Pflichtangaben fuer Vereine:
| Angabe | Erforderlich | MOe-Wert |
|---|---|---|
| Vereinsname | Ja | Menschlichkeit Oesterreich |
| Rechtsform | Ja | Verein (ZVR) |
| ZVR-Nummer | Ja | 1182213083 |
| Sitz | Ja | [Adresse pruefen] |
| Kontakt-Email | Ja | [email protected] |
| Vertretungsbefugnis | Ja | Obfrau/Obmann |
| Vereinszweck | Empfohlen | Demokratische Partizipation |
Pruefung: Impressumsseite lesen und gegen Pflichtliste abgleichen.
2. Datenschutzerklaerung (DSGVO Art. 13/14)
Pflichtinhalte:
□ Name und Kontaktdaten des Verantwortlichen
□ Kontaktdaten Datenschutzbeauftragter (falls vorhanden)
□ Zwecke und Rechtsgrundlage der Verarbeitung
□ Berechtigte Interessen (falls Art. 6 Abs. 1 lit. f)
□ Empfaenger oder Kategorien von Empfaengern
□ Uebermittlung in Drittlaender (inkl. Garantien)
□ Speicherdauer oder Kriterien fuer Festlegung
□ Betroffenenrechte (Auskunft, Berichtigung, Loeschung, Einschraenkung, Widerspruch, Datenportabilitaet)
□ Recht auf Beschwerde bei Aufsichtsbehoerde (oesterr. Datenschutzbehoerde)
□ Ob Bereitstellung gesetzlich/vertraglich vorgeschrieben ist
□ Automatisierte Entscheidungsfindung (falls vorhanden)
□ Cookie-Information (Kategorien, Zwecke, Ablaufzeiten)
□ Drittanbieter-Dienste (Analytics, Payment, Social Media)
Oesterreich-spezifisch:
- Aufsichtsbehoerde: Oesterreichische Datenschutzbehoerde (dsb.gv.at)
- Beschwerderecht explizit erwaehnen
3. Weitere Transparenzpflichten
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 13d ago First seen · 124 lines · 49 tokens per session scan A e51cab491617
transparenz-check is a skill published in the GitHub repository ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open (72 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 49 tokens to every session and 1,053 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other skills, from other repositories
pia-generator
Generate structured privacy impact assessments so Claude can organize project privacy risks, controls, and decision points into a review-ready report.
audit-scope-checklist
Generate a scoped IT audit program with controls mapped to roles and compliance frameworks. Use this skill for audit planning, control checklist generation, and auditprogram.json creation.
compliance-checker
Compare system configuration evidence against common control frameworks and produce a concise compliance assessment with gaps and remediation priorities.
compliance-controls-playbook
Guide Claude through a structured compliance audit workflow covering framework selection, evidence planning, control testing, exception handling, and reporting.
evidence-tracker
Manage audit evidence requests, collection progress, and status reporting so Claude can keep audits organized and identify overdue or blocked evidence items.
consent-checker
Review privacy policy or notice text against common privacy frameworks so Claude can explain coverage gaps, strengths, and compliance priorities.