Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx skills add ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open --skill verify-federal-judgment-l0ckagit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-openWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/verify-federal-judgment-l0cka)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/verify-federal-judgment-l0cka"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/verify-federal-judgment-l0cka/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/verify-federal-judgment-l0cka"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/verify-federal-judgment-l0cka.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00145 | $0.01219 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00058 | $0.00488 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00029 | $0.00244 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00015 | $0.00122 |
Grade A, and why
verify-federal-judgment-l0cka scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 22d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 98 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Verify Federal Judgment
Two official publishers control this skill. The Federal Circuit and Family
Court publishes its judgments at fcfcoa.gov.au and answers direct
requests. The Federal Court publishes through Federal Law Search on
fedcourt.gov.au, which challenges automated clients — that path is
human-operated browser only, and this skill never solves or bypasses the
challenge. Produce a provenance record, not a bare assertion that a case
"exists".
Read ../../references/case-law-verification-method.md before verifying. It defines the outcome semantics, access rules and restriction handling.
Workflow
- Fix the scope.
- Accept
FCA,FCAFC,FedCFamC1A,FedCFamC1F,FedCFamC2F,FedCFamC2Gcitations, the historicalFCCA,FamCAandFamCAFCidentifiers, FCR reported citations, and federal case names. - Return
OUTSIDE SCOPEfor the High Court, State or Territory courts, treatment analysis or advice.
- Accept
- Choose the publisher path.
FedCFamC…,FCCA,FamCA,FamCAFC→ searchfcfcoa.gov.audirectly. One targeted lookup per citation; never crawl listings.FCA,FCAFC,FCR→ Federal Law Search onfedcourt.gov.au.- With a human-operated browser tool available, guide the lookup
through the judgments search at
fedcourt.gov.au/digital-law-library/judgments/search, entering the citation without brackets in the Case Name/MNC field (for example2023 FCA 555). The results page reportsDisplay results X - Y of Zwith the case name, reported citation and decision date. Never automate around the bot challenge; the search backend challenges non-browser clients as well. - Without a browser, return
UNVERIFIABLEand give that search page URL and the exact search terms for a manual check. State plainly that unverifiable is not evidence of fabrication.
- With a human-operated browser tool available, guide the lookup
through the judgments search at
- Confirm identity.
- Match the case name, citation, court and decision date as published.
- For an FCR citation, resolve to the medium-neutral citation through the court's search before concluding anything.
- Treat a supplied case name that differs materially from the published name as a qualification, and say which differs.
- Check restrictions before reproducing anything.
- Family-law decisions are published under statutory anonymisation (Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) pt XIVB, s 114Q; formerly s 121 before 6 May 2024); treat the pseudonym as the official case name and never attempt to identify parties.
- Preserve any suppression or non-publication notation found.
- Report using the result contract.
What ships with it
2 files beside SKILL.md in the same directory: the scripts, references and assets a skill reads on demand. Not counted in the per-session cost; read them before you install if any of them is executable.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 22d ago First seen · 98 lines · 145 tokens per session scan A 5c78ef33a596
verify-federal-judgment-l0cka is a skill published in the GitHub repository ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open (95 stars, last pushed 15d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 145 tokens to every session and 1,219 once invoked, about $0.0006 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-06.
Other skills, from other repositories
local-ai-agents
Build local-first AI agents that run entirely on a developer workstation with Microsoft Foundry Local and Qwen function-calling models. Covers Small Language Models (SLMs), the OpenAI-compatible local endpoint, sandboxed local tools, local RAG with Chroma, local MCP servers, hybrid cloud/local routing, and the…
systematic-debugging
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes.
next-cache-components-adoption
Turn on Cache Components in a Next.js app and resolve the blocking routes it surfaces. Use when the user wants to enable, adopt, or migrate to Cache Components, flip the cacheComponents flag, work through a flood of blocking-prerender / instant validation errors, run the cache-components-instant-false codemod, or…
chat-pet-sprite-creation
Use when creating or changing VS Code chat pet sprite art, sprite sheets, state animations, eye treatments, Stable/Insiders variants, or pet transitions under src/vs/workbench/contrib/chat/browser/widget/media/chatPet.
cpu-profile-analysis
Analyze V8/Chrome CPU profiles (.cpuprofile) and DevTools trace files (Trace-.json). Use when: profiling performance, investigating slow functions, comparing code paths, finding bottlenecks, analyzing timeToRequest, understanding call trees from sampling profiler data, analyzing layout/paint/rendering, investigating…
insight-error-page
Write or audit an insight-kind error page for the Next.js dev overlay. Use when creating a new errors/ .mdx page, auditing an existing one, or checking that a page matches the framework fix cards. Covers page structure, title alignment, FixCard cards with Copy prompt button, code snippets, terminology verification…