workplace-email-privacy

workplace-email-privacy is a skill for Claude Code, Codex from ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open. It costs 83 tokens per session (3,407 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A compliance framework for monitoring employee email and internet use. It explains how employers should balance business interests with workers’ rights to privacy and private correspondence.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review workplace monitoring plans, acceptable-use policies, and whether monitoring message content or metadata is justified.
Why use it?
It helps identify when workplace monitoring may be excessive, unexpected, or legally unjustified. It provides a proportionality test based on European privacy law and labour-law principles.

Skill for Claude CodeCodex

Written for no agent in particular: nothing here depends on one.

Good fit Use it to review workplace monitoring plans, acceptable-use policies, and whether monitoring message content or metadata is justified.

Compare 6 skills from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/workplace-email-privacy
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Any agent
npx skills add ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open --skill workplace-email-privacy
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open

Made for: Claude Code, Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for workplace-email-privacy

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/workplace-email-privacy/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/workplace-email-privacy)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/workplace-email-privacy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/workplace-email-privacy/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for workplace-email-privacy

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/workplace-email-privacy"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/skills/thomasmoreai/legal-skills-open/workplace-email-privacy.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 83 Skills are progressive disclosure: only the name and description are preloaded; the body loads when the skill is used.
When invoked 3,407 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe. Third-party audits
  • NVIDIA SkillSpector pass 7 Sept 2026
How audits are shown
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00083 $0.03407
Opus 5 $0.00042 $0.01703
Sonnet 5 $0.00017 $0.00681
Haiku 4.5 $0.00008 $0.00341

Measured 9d ago against content hash c7c67e49f88f, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-12, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

workplace-email-privacy scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

cross-jurisdiction/data-protection/skills/workplace-email-privacy/SKILL.md · 236 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 236 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Workplace Email Privacy

Overview

Workplace email and internet monitoring sits at the intersection of employer legitimate interests and employee fundamental rights to privacy and correspondence under Art. 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), Art. 7 of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, and the GDPR. The landmark Grand Chamber judgment in Barbulescu v Romania (Application No. 61496/08, 5 September 2017) established a six-factor proportionality test that all European employers must satisfy before monitoring employee electronic communications. This skill provides a compliance framework for implementing email and internet monitoring that respects these legal boundaries.

ECHR Art. 8 — Right to Respect for Private Life and Correspondence

Art. 8(1): "Everyone has the right to respect for his private life, family life, his home and his correspondence."

Art. 8(2): Interference is permitted only where it is "in accordance with the law," pursues a "legitimate aim," and is "necessary in a democratic society."

The ECHR has consistently held that "correspondence" includes electronic communications sent from the workplace, and that "private life" encompasses activities in the professional context (Niemietz v Germany, Application No. 13710/88, 1992).

Barbulescu v Romania — The Six-Factor Test

The Grand Chamber overturned the Chamber's earlier judgment and established that States have a positive obligation to ensure that domestic law provides adequate protection for employees' Art. 8 rights in the workplace monitoring context. The Court articulated six factors that national courts and employers must consider:

Factor 1: Prior Notification Has the employee been notified in advance of the nature and extent of monitoring? The notification must be clear, specific, and provided before monitoring begins. A general statement that "communications may be monitored" is insufficient — the employee must understand what is monitored (content, metadata, or both), when monitoring occurs, and who has access to the results.

Read the full file on GitHub · 236 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 9d ago First seen · 236 lines · 83 tokens per session scan A c7c67e49f88f

Subscribe to this mod's changes

workplace-email-privacy is a skill published in the GitHub repository ThomasMoreAI/legal-skills-open (72 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 83 tokens to every session and 3,407 once invoked, about $0.0004 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.